-
Recent Posts
- erroneously collecting sales tax isn’t an unfair act or practice in trade or commerce
- I can’t believe it’s not butter—because the label said it was all butter
- Another pandemic university fees claim fails
- Dastar bars some claims about “patented” statements but related superiority statements are still at issue
- policy of paying only 85% purchase price for claims under service policy isn’t inherently deceptive/abusive
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: October 2013
Software update defeats class certification
Waller v. Hewlett–Packard Co., No. 11 cv0454, 2013 WL 5551642 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2013) So I’m trying to cut down on California coverage and just give the highlights. That said, I recommend this case for some of the most … Continue reading
Willful false advertising insufficient to justify fee award
Eastman Chemical Co. v. Plastipure, Inc., No. A–12–CA–057, 2013 WL 5555373 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2013) Previous discussion here. Based on its successful Lanham Act false advertising trial result, Eastman sought attorneys’ fees and costs (the latter of which it … Continue reading
Failure to allege agency relationship leads to fee award
Anastasia Int’l, Inc. v. EM Online Pty Ltd., No. 13 Civ. 2919, 2013 WL 5550211 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2013) Anastasia sued various defendants for trademark infringement and false advertising, along with related state torts. Anastasia runs Anastasiadate.com, an “international dating … Continue reading
Trademarks as celebrities?
Briefly noted, this advice from Fredrikson & Byron PA: “It can be a good thing to think of your trademarks as celebrities and of yourself as their agent, publicist, bodyguard and fan.” I couldn’t disagree more (though I’m intrigued by … Continue reading
Posted in right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
The milk of human lawsuits
Gitson v.Trader Joe’s Company, No. 13–cv–01333, 2013 WL 5513711 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2013) Plaintiffs sued over “evaporated cane juice” and got basically the result in Wallaby, previously summarized. They also alleged that certain soy milk products were labeled … Continue reading
sugar by any other name unlawful, but not misleading
Morgan v. Wallaby Yogurt Company, Inc., No. 13–cv–00296, 2013 WL 5514563 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2013) Another “evaporated cane juice” claim, here for yogurt that used that term in its ingredients list instead of “sugar” or “dried cane syrup.” The … Continue reading
Samsung made a vid (sort of) as an ad
The wrist-phone has been long promised, as this Samsung ad indicates. Vidding is the act or process of creating a fan-oriented video or “fanvid” using live-action TV or movie footage set to music (or other audio). The Samsung ad even … Continue reading
"unlimited" service that was actually limited could deceive consumers
Chapman v. Skype Inc., — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, No. B241398, 2013 WL 5502960 (Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2013) Chapman alleged that Skype falsely advertised its voice over IP calling plans as “Unlimited” when they actually limited the number of minutes per … Continue reading
mere lack of substantiation isn’t actionable by consumers
Nilon v. Natural-Immunogenics Corp., No. 3:12cv00930, 2013 WL 5462288 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 30, 2013) Defendant NI sells a colloidal silver dietary supplement, “basically positively charged silver particles suspended in purified water,” that claims to provide immune support. Nilon bought it … Continue reading
another evaporated cane juice plaintiff gets to proceed
Werdebaugh v. Blue Diamond Growers, No. 12–CV–02724, 2013 WL 5487236 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013) The usual California claims, this time directed at Blue Diamond’s almond milk products and snack foods, which allegedly falsely claimed to be “All Natural” despite … Continue reading