-
Recent Posts
- Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
- court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
- alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
- Great balls of fire: lawsuit over malt sold looking nearly identical to whisky can continue
- Second Circuit signals some minimal flexibility on Polaroid analysis in another strip club false endorsement case
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: January 2018
New York GBL Section 349 covers ordinary trademark claims, court rules
Mayes v. Summit Entertainment Corp., No. 16-CV-06533, 2018 WL 566314 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2017) (magistrate judge) Plaintiffs, eight professional models and actresses, alleged that the owners and operators of a strip club on Long Island (Summit) unlawfully used Plaintiffs’ images … Continue reading
Confusion with firm sued for sexual harassment causes irreparable harm
Newmark Realty Capital, Inc., v. BGC Partners, Inc., No. 16-cv-01702 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2017) Newmark Realty Capital (founded 1991) and defendants BGC Partners and Newmark & Co. Real Estate “traditionally operated in distinct sectors of the real estate market … Continue reading
Pure disparagement by competitor is commercial speech even without invitation to buy
Monat Global Corp. v. Kavanaugh , 2018 WL 501616, No. 17-cv-1666 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2018) The parties sell competing hair products. Kavanaugh allegedly orchestrated an “[I]nternet smear campaign” by posting false comments on Facebook about Monat’s products and marketing … Continue reading
CFP: Yale/Stanford/Harvard Junior Faculty Forum
Request for Submissions Yale/Stanford/Harvard Junior Faculty Forum June 13-14, 2018, Harvard Law School Yale, Stanford, and Harvard Law Schools are soliciting submissions for the 19th session of the Yale/Stanford/Harvard Junior Faculty Forum, to be held at Harvard Law School on … Continue reading
That’s swell: court rules that NY doesn’t impose “use in commerce” limit on unfair competition
Can’t Live Without It, LLC v. ETS Express, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2018 WL 401778, No. 17-cv-3506 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2018) Plaintiff S’well sued ETS for trademark infringement and related claims based on its sales of the Force and Swig … Continue reading
Beyond Belmora: foreign TM owner proceeds under Lanham Act and Inter-American Convention
S.A.S. v. Latinfood U.S. Corp., Civ. No. 16-6576, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2017 WL 6940696 (D.N.J. Dec. 29, 2017) Industria, a Colombian food corporation and Colombian owner of the Zenú and Ranchera marks, sued Latinfood, for reasons you can guess when … Continue reading
Another IP plaintiff fails to show irreparable harm (false advertising/trade secret)
Impax Media Inc. v. Northeast Advertising Corp., No. 17 Civ. 8272, 2018 WL 358284 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2018) Impax, which provides digital video screens that show ads (mostly in supermarkets), sought to enjoin defendants (AdCorp) from competing with Impax by … Continue reading
There’s only one master of The Commodores: the group itself
Commodores Entertainment Corp. v. McClary, 2018 WL 327302, No. 16-15794 (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2018) McClary was an original member of the award-winning Commodores, but, by his own admission, he “split from the band” in 1984 to strike out on … Continue reading
“I’m your lawyer” might be false advertising when lawyer’s firm won’t do the work
Rosenbaum & Assoc., P.C. v. Morgan & Morgan, 2018 WL 327167, No. 17-4250 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2018) A Philadelphia personal injury law firm that advertises extensively on TV and billboards alleged that a national personal injury law firm’s expansion … Continue reading
Finding of willful infringement still doesn’t merit injunction under Herb Reed
A.C.T. Prods., Inc. v. W.S. Indus., Inc., No. 16-0476, 2017 WL 4708152 (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2017) Herb Reed strikes again. The jury found that defendant had engaged in willful trademark infringement and false advertising, but also that the four-year … Continue reading