Tag Archives: trade secrets

IPSC Closing Plenary Session: AI Everywhere All at Once

Posted on August 8, 2026 by rtushnet

Plagiarism or Transformation Machines? Evidence on Copyright, Economic Substitutes, and AI, Stefan Bechtold (with David Abrams & Christian Peukert) Prevalence rate: OpenAI v. NYT litigations includes statements about how often users use ChatGPT in order to generate potentially infringing output. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session 2 Copyright Fixation & Subject Matter

Posted on August 6, 2026 by rtushnet

Culture Isn’t Transitory: The Disappearance of Music and Film Under the Copyright Regime Amanda M. Whorton & David S. Levine How could © improve cultural heritage preservation? Modestly change fixation to help archivists. We have only one video recording of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session: IP Openness, Secrecy, and Enclosure

Posted on August 6, 2026 by rtushnet

Selective Exploitation, Kristelia García Justifications for deference to rightsholders in enforcement context are less persuasive than justifications for deference to rightsholders in exploitation decisions. These aren’t infringers—outside of ©’s standard infringement/remedies scope. Conduct at issue: shifting content from Peacock to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

a bot maybe accessed a former employer’s trade secrets; larger trade secret/false advertising issues ensure employer’s victory

Posted on May 29, 2026 by rtushnet

Capconvert, LLC v. Brown, 2026 WL 1471880, No. 26-cv-02149-CRB (N.D. Cal. May 26, 2026) Capconvert sued its former employee Brown primarily over alleged misappropriation of Capconvert’s trade secrets and confidential information for use in a competing business venture involving search … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?

Posted on January 31, 2026 by rtushnet

Moderator: Edward Lee, Santa Clara Law BJ Ard (copyright), University of Wisconsin Law School © is often displaced by contract and other regimes in sectors—scaling it up or down would produce minimal impact. Consumer copying for example is often solved … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see

Posted on December 11, 2025 by rtushnet

Red Sense LLC v. Bohuslavskiy, 2025 WL 3539968, No. 25cv12281 (EP) (AME) (D.N.J. Dec. 10, 2025) This case illustrates that tortious interference has a small remaining scope—where there’s no “commercial advertising or promotion” because of the failure to solicit a … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tiktok’s other, smaller legal problem

Posted on April 29, 2024 by rtushnet

Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co. v. Tiktok Inc., 2024 WL 1772833, No. 23-cv-06012-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024) Skipping the copyright and trade secrets part of the case. (In brief: Meishe argued that Tiktok copied its code via an employee … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Session 1: AI

Posted on February 2, 2024 by rtushnet

Nikola Datzov, Can AI Keep a (Trade) Secret? We’ve funneled IP protection for AI generated inventions/information to trade secrecy w/o patent or copyright for human authors/inventors. But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. How can we trust AI … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Closing Plenary Session

Posted on August 4, 2023 by rtushnet

An Author/Reader Conversation about Jessica Silbey, Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Internet Age (2022) Robert Brauneis: Three layers—(1) object of discovery: creator and innovator accounts, concerns, what kind of conditions support/hinder them in their work; (2) … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 2: Data Access

Posted on June 29, 2023 by rtushnet

Impulse Statement: Christophe Geiger: Relevance to © exceptions and limitations—access to © protected work is important for this work. Research organizations have exception in © Directive and also are vital to DSA, so we must look at both. Only digital … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment