-
Recent Posts
- “Maximum Strength” is plausibly misleading when cheaper Regular Strength has more active ingredient by volume
- 100% Pure Aloe can contain preservatives, stabilizers in the absence of evidence from consumers that they care
- antitrust claim based in part on false advertising in concentrated market survives
- 230 protects anti-malware vendor against noncompetitors
- “no soy protein” claim for dog food plausibly indicates no soy
Recent Comments
Archives
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: copyright
WIPIP 2020, Day 2 panel 4
Panel 4: Copyright Stephanie Bair, Copyright’s Hidden Costs We’ve used the creativity literature to examine the benefits side of ©, but not necessarily the costs. The benefits of engaging in creative pursuits/having creative skills: being good at problem finding, being … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Day 2 panel 4 conferences, music, WIPIP 2020
Leave a comment
WIPIP 2020, Day 2 panel 3
Panel 3: Copyright Sarah Polcz, Loyalties v. Royalties: Relational Roots in Joint Authorship Relative reward (a pun!) and joint authorship. Our satisfaction for compensation is not just about absolutes, but about how fair the share is compared to the share … Continue reading
WIPIP 2020, Santa Clara, day 2 panel 2
Panel: Copyright Fair Use Jacob Victor, Utility-Expanding Fair Use: New technological developments: utility-enhancing fair use. Project: disaggregate it from other forms of fair use and see why fair use might not be the best mechanism for allowing these technologies to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, day 2 panel 2 conferences, Santa Clara, WIPIP 2020
Leave a comment
WIPIP 2020, Santa Clara, day 2 panel 1
Thanks to Eric Goldman and the rest of Santa Clara’s team for organizing a great WIPIP. I was only able to attend the second day, unfortunately. Copyright Christine Davik, Unregistered Complaints: Only US works (b/c of Berne) are required to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, day 2 panel 1 conferences, Santa Clara, WIPIP 2020
Leave a comment
WIPIP 2020, Santa Clara, day 2 panel 1
Thanks to Eric Goldman and the rest of Santa Clara’s team for organizing a great WIPIP. I was only able to attend the second day, unfortunately. Copyright Christine Davik, Unregistered Complaints: Only US works (b/c of Berne) are required to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, day 2 panel 1 conferences, Santa Clara, WIPIP 2020
Leave a comment
Design Law Scholars Roundtable part 3
Session 3: Shaping an Overall Approach to Protection Introductions: Jerry Reichman and Estelle Derclaye In what ways should different forms of protection be tailored to various types of subject matter (construed legally as forms of intellectual property, but also subject … Continue reading
Design Law Scholars Roundtable (Notre Dame) part 1
I have just now gotten around to my notes from this excellent roundtable. Introduction: Mark McKenna & Graeme Dinwoodie Why do a roundtable like this? Putting together scholarly discussion for long-term outputs rather than particular works in the short term. … Continue reading
