-
Recent Posts
- it’s hard to get rid of a foreign TM owner’s complaint at the motion to dismiss stage despite territoriality
- dct strikes down California’s new recyclability law on vagueness/1A grounds
- look, there’s a lawsuit: bad claim against comedian leads to anti-SLAPP award
- 5th Circuit puts its own spin on the server test
- weak infringement case + bad litigation conduct = fee shift for anticompetitive suit over descriptive term
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: copyright
5th Circuit puts its own spin on the server test
Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., No. 25-60550 (5th Cir. Aug. 27, 2026) This is being reported as creating a split with the 9th Circuit; I don’t think that’s right in practice. As far as I can tell, the … Continue reading
Midjourney can’t force Disney to disclose the prompts it used that didn’t generate material in complaint
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Midjourney, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-05275-JAK-AJR, 2026 WL 2055488 (C.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2026) This is what seems like a significant discovery dispute; I’m not an evidence scholar, but there’s interaction with the fair use analysis that copyright … Continue reading
IPSC Closing Plenary Session: AI Everywhere All at Once
Plagiarism or Transformation Machines? Evidence on Copyright, Economic Substitutes, and AI, Stefan Bechtold (with David Abrams & Christian Peukert) Prevalence rate: OpenAI v. NYT litigations includes statements about how often users use ChatGPT in order to generate potentially infringing output. … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session 5, IP, Politics & Identity
Intellectual Property and Political Identity, Barbara Lauriat IP features some strange bedfellows, going back as early as we can find about patent & ©. Project: a book on Intellectual Property & Victorian Inquiry, examining Royal Commissions on Patent & Copyright. … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session 2 Copyright Fixation & Subject Matter
Culture Isn’t Transitory: The Disappearance of Music and Film Under the Copyright Regime Amanda M. Whorton & David S. Levine How could © improve cultural heritage preservation? Modestly change fixation to help archivists. We have only one video recording of … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session 1 Copyright Secondary Liability
Copyright’s Intent, Mark McKenna (with Laura A. Heymann & Alfred C. Yen) Cox: Contributory infringement for service providers can be shown only with intent, or with a service tailored to infringement. What happened to Gershwin? Will courts really accept that? … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 1201, 1202, conferences, copyright, secondary liability
Leave a comment
IPSC Opening Plenary Session: IP Openness, Secrecy, and Enclosure
Selective Exploitation, Kristelia García Justifications for deference to rightsholders in enforcement context are less persuasive than justifications for deference to rightsholders in exploitation decisions. These aren’t infringers—outside of ©’s standard infringement/remedies scope. Conduct at issue: shifting content from Peacock to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, patent, trade secrets, trademark
Leave a comment
Reading List: Jessica Litman, Casting Aspersions
Read it now. Short, readable, and recommended: “If the politics of reforming copyright law to pay more attention to whether and how much … money finds its way into authors’ pockets seems too daunting to try, that says a great … Continue reading
Promoting Progress part 2 at AU WCL
Framing the Public Interest Agenda – Beyond the Narrative of “Content vs. Tech” Framing Digital Consumer Rights US experience is v different from rest of world—want to support the int’l discussion keeping that in mind. US libraries are ubiquitous, 122,000 … Continue reading
Promoting Progress: 50 Years of the Copyright Act from the Perspective of the Public Interest
AU Washington College of Law, Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property Chatham House rules. Opening discussion: The Role of the Public Interest in Framing the Copyright Act of 1976 AI is sucking all the air out of © discussion … Continue reading