-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: preemption
100% good news: 7th Cir. reverses “100% grated parmesan cheese” dismissal
Bell v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 2020 WL 7137786, — F.3d –, Nos. 19-2581, 19-2741 (7th Cir. Dec. 7, 2020) Note: Then-Circuit Judge Barrett was a member of the panel when this case was submitted but did not participate in … Continue reading
FDA preemption/preclusion after Pom Wonderful: still powerful for drugs
Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc., 2020 WL 5535026, No. 19-cv-00318-MR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2020) Exela sued Sandoz for unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of North Carolina law; tortious interference with prospective business advantage; and Lanham Act … Continue reading
Second Circuit finds conflict preemption of publicity rts for unauthorized music sample
Jackson v. Roberts, No. 19-480 (2d Cir. Aug. 19, 2020) Judge Leval, kindly citing my work as well as that of other scholars, finds a right of publicity claim against a remix album preempted by the Copyright Act/Supremacy Clause through … Continue reading
patent publication privilege mostly protects licensee against licensor’s false advertising claims
AU New Haven, LLC v. YKK Corp., No. 15-cv-3411-GHW, 2020 WL 4366394 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 30, 2020) Summarizing only a few key issues: YKK entered into an exclusive licensing agreement (the ELA) with the owners of a recently issued patent. The … Continue reading
9th Cir. revives suit against allegedly deceptive “prescription pet food” marketing
Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., No. 18-15026, — F.3d —-, 2020 WL 4331765 (9th Cir. Jul. 28, 2020) Over a dissent, the court of appeals reversed the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims based on allegedly deceptive marketing of “so-called prescription … Continue reading
statements to 3 of 15 market participants weren’t “commercial advertising or promotion”
Globe Cotyarn Pvt. Ltd. v. Next Creations Holdings LLC, No. 18 Civ. 04208 (ER), 2020 WL 4586892 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2020) Globe, a fabric manufacturer, sued a fabric patent holder, AAVN, and its subsidiary, Next Creations, for allegedly falsely telling … Continue reading
context matters: “mineral-based” sunscreen with chemical-based active ingredients is plausibly deceptive
Prescott v. Bayer Healthcare LLC, 2020 WL 4430958, No. 20-cv-00102-NC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 31, 2020) (magistrate) Plaintiffs alleged that defendants deceived consumers by labeling their sunscreens as “mineral-based” when the sunscreens contain active chemical ingredients. As the court explains, … Continue reading
“100% Natural” might be deceptive as applied to food w/bioengineered ingredients
Lee v. Conagra Brands, Inc., No. 17-2131 (1st Cir. May 7, 2020) Lee alleged that Wesson’s supposedly “100% Natural” vegetable oil contained GMOs, which she regarded as “quite unnatural,” in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A. She also alleged … Continue reading
