-
Recent Posts
- 9th Circuit applies Dastar to bar false advertising liability based on “first to market” claims
- claim that entity sells unapproved drugs does not misrepresent “origin, sponsorship, or approval” for Lanham Act purposes
- plaintiff delay affects irreparable harm and balance of equities where third parties rely on defendant
- a bot maybe accessed a former employer’s trade secrets; larger trade secret/false advertising issues ensure employer’s victory
- Igloo must face biodegradability/recycled content/made in USA consumer claims
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: preemption
high sugar content doesn’t make “Breakfast Essentials” name or health claims misleading
Testori v. Nestlé Health Science US Holdings, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 1282540, No. 1:25-cv-01318-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. May 11, 2026) The court dismissed California claims against Carnation Breakfast Essentials Nutritional Drink. The drink label highlighted its 10g of protein … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
Copyright Act Panel 4: The Shifting Line Between Federal and State Protection
29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 R. Anthony Reese, UCI School of Law Fundamental change: eliminating common-law copyright for unpublished works and unifying the regime at creation. Contemporaries like Ralph Sharp Brown saw … Continue reading
Copyright Act Panel 4: The Shifting Line Between Federal and State Protection
29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 R. Anthony Reese, UCI School of Law Fundamental change: eliminating common-law copyright for unpublished works and unifying the regime at creation. Contemporaries like Ralph Sharp Brown saw … Continue reading
claims about scientific studies might imply FDA approval
BioGaia USA, LLC v. Probiotiv Naturals LLC, 2025 WL 2946910, No. CV 25-3592 PA (MBKx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2025) BioGaia sued Probiotiv – a competitor in the sale of priobiotic dietary supplements for oral health, for false advertising; Probiotiv … Continue reading
pharmacos face judicial resistance to claims against compounding pharmacies for weight loss drugs
Three cases showing aspects of the challenges, only one of which even partially survives: Novo Nordisk, Inc. v. Brooksville Pharm. Inc., 785 F.Supp.3d 1123 (M.D. Fla. 2025) Novo Nordisk sells FDA-approved drugs containing semaglutide, Wegovy, Ozempic, and Rybelsus. Brooksville is … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preclusion, preemption
Leave a comment
mislabeling nut ingredients doesn’t justify class action because not everyone has nut allergies
Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC, No. 23-cv-00099-RFL, 2025 WL 2644747 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2025) Fukaya, who is allergic to tree nuts, alleged that Daiso failed to properly label its pre-packaged food products as containing tree nuts on its English-language … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
P&G’s brand extension ZzzQuil must face lawsuit alleging falsity of its “Non-Habit Forming” claim
Sneed v. Procter & Gamble Company, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1017933, No. 23-cv-05443-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) This case is about a product I recently noticed, “Nighttime Sleep Aid” products containing diphenhydramine hydrochloride as ZzzQuil. Sneed alleged that … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
plaintiffs don’t have to use full FDA methods for testing nutrients to avoid FDA preemption
Scheibe v. ProSupps USA, LLC, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 1730272, No. 23-3300 (9th Cir. Jun. 24, 2025) The FDA specifies testing methods for determining the amount of carbohydrates and calories in a food, as well as a sampling process … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
FDA preclusion doesn’t work as often after Pom Wonderful (or Loper Bright?)
Pacira BioSciences, Inc. v. Ventis Pharma, Inc., 2025 WL 576549, No. 2:24-cv-07554-MRA-RAO, (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2025) Pacira alleged that its competitor (here Ventis) violated the Lanham Act by making claims about its drugs relating to (1) exemption from FDA … Continue reading
distinguishing false establishment claims from lack of substantiation claims
Kurin, Inc. v. ICU Medical, Inc., 2024 WL 5416672, No. 8:24-cv-00564-FWS-ADS (C.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2024) The parties compete in the market for medical devices aimed at addressing blood culture contamination (BCC) in hospitals. BCC is both medically and financially … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment