-
Recent Posts
- The fact/opinion divide: threat or menace? 9th Cir revives suit against Malwarebytes
- Are surcharge disclosures fair?
- Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
- court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
- alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: February 2016
On the importance of knowing your genre
I haven’t written about the Sherrilyn Kenyon v. Cassandra Clare lawsuit over Darkhunters v. Shadowhunters, though I did read the complaint. I didn’t find the copyright claims to make it past assertions of similarity in ideas, though trademark is often … Continue reading
When are lost sales consequential damages?
BPI Sports, LLC v. Labdoor, Inc., 2016 WL 739652, No. 15-62212 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 25, 2016) BPI makes supplements, including “Best BCAA,” which contains branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) in multi-chain peptide form, rather than isolated, free-form BCAAs. LabDoor’s … Continue reading
Ingredient supplier has standing to challenge supplement claims
Obesity Research Institute, LLC v. Fiber Research International, LLC, 2016 WL 739796, No. 15-cv-00595 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2016) Fiber Research alleged that Obesity Research made claims for its weight loss product, Lipozene, touting clinical testing supporting the role … Continue reading
Cardozo Law Advertising Conference Panel 2: Native Advertising
Moderator Felix Wu | Professor and Faculty Director, Cardozo Data Law Initiative, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Panelists: Shelly Paioff | Deputy General Counsel & Head of Legal, US, Taboola: Taboola is a content recommendation platform—publishers like NBC, … Continue reading
Advertising law at Cardozo
Cardozo Law Conference: New Impressions of Advertising Law Panel 1: False Advertising (herein of Pom Wonderful v. FTC) Moderator: Brett Frischmann | Professor and Director, Cardozo Intellectual Property & Information Law Program, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Advertising law at Cardozo conferences, false advertising, fda, first amendment, ftc
Leave a comment
8th Circuit finds copyright preemption of publicity claim
Dryer v. National Football League, No. 14-3428 (8th Cir. Feb. 26, 2016) I blogged about the district court ruling and wrote an amicus brief in the appeal; now the 8th Circuit affirms the rejection of football players’ right of … Continue reading
National Review reports on false advertising suit against Trump University
Hey, the National Review found a consumer protection lawsuit it likes: the one against Trump University. If he’s elected, do we get to call him the Conman-in-Chief? from Blogger http://ift.tt/1WLfYtg
Another court finds keyword buys don’t cause likely confusion
USA Nutraceuticals Group, Inc. v. BPI Sports, LLC, 2016 WL 695596, No. 15-CIV-80352 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 22, 2016) Plaintiff, here “Beast,” sells sports nutrition supplements using trademarks such as “Beast,” “Beast Sports,” “Beast Mode,” and “Train Like a Beast.” … Continue reading
Second Circuit upholds law against “credit surcharges” that allows “cash discounts”
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 803 F. 3d 94 (2d Cir. 2015) Somehow I missed this when it came out last September! New York General Business Law § 518 provides that “[n]o seller in any sales transaction may impose … Continue reading
WIPIP Session 7: International issues
Session 7 Room 145: International IP Sean Flynn, Mike Palmedo, & Walter Park, Creating a Database of Changes to Copyright User Rights in 40 Nations Fair dealing is flexible (uses a balancing test) but not open (limited classes … Continue reading