Monthly Archives: June 2015

Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in different contexts

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark Contexts Do the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? Is assessment of the reaction of the average consumer in trade … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in different contexts

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark Contexts Do the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? Is assessment of the reaction of the average consumer in trade … Continue reading →

Posted in conferences, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, right of publicity, trademark | Leave a comment

DMCA exemption followup

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

The OTW/EFF response to the Copyright Office’s additional questions, filed yesterday, is now available.  Of note, the Copyright Office asked us about the extent to which K-12 students and teachers were covered by the existing noncommercial exemption. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1RPqZq8

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Fourth Circuit destroys literal falsity

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

In re GNC Corp., — F.3d –, 2015 WL 3798174 (4th Cir. June 19, 2015)   Well, this is a terrible opinion that makes no sense.  In the Fourth Circuit, if reasonable experts disagree, it’s now impossible for one to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

DMCA exemption followup

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

The OTW/EFF response to the Copyright Office’s additional questions, filed yesterday, is now available.  Of note, the Copyright Office asked us about the extent to which K-12 students and teachers were covered by the existing noncommercial exemption. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in dmca, drm, fanworks, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Fourth Circuit destroys literal falsity

Posted on June 30, 2015 by rtushnet

In re GNC Corp., — F.3d –, 2015 WL 3798174 (4thCir. June 19, 2015)   Well, this is a terrible opinion that makes no sense.  In the Fourth Circuit, if reasonable experts disagree, it’s now impossible for one to be … Continue reading →

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: establishing the features of the consumer

Posted on June 29, 2015 by rtushnet

Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer   The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. What does this mean? Does the modifier “average” or … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: establishing the features of the consumer

Posted on June 29, 2015 by rtushnet

Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer   The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. What does this mean? Does the modifier “average” or … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Trademark scholars roundtable: roles for the consumer in TM

Posted on June 29, 2015 by rtushnet

Seventh Trademark Scholars Roundtable: The Construction of the Consumer in Trade Mark Law   Session 1: Roles for the Consumer in Trade Mark Law What role does the “consumer” (whether “average” or “reasonable” or otherwise) play in trade mark law? … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ninth Circuit rejects class certification because ads differed

Posted on June 29, 2015 by rtushnet

Cabral v. Supple LLC, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2015 WL 3855142, No. 13–55943 (9th Cir. June 23, 2015)   The court of appeals vacated the certification of a class of purchasers of a dietary supplement. The certified class was “[a]ll persons … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment