-
Recent Posts
- Third Circuit follows Second in protecting medical journals against trade libel claims
- “Safe” not puffery in context of electric dog collars
- Protecting Creativity with a Bottle of Jack on the Floribama Shore (and tiny JDI oral argument observations)
- Another digital “buy” button case survives motion to dismiss
- Supplement guide was plausibly an agent of supplement company; direct and secondary liability available
Recent Comments
Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: drm
1201 hearings, LA, streamlined video exemption
IN SUPPORT Art Neill New Media Rights Elizabeth Rosenblatt Organization for Transformative Works Jack Lerner, Brian Tamsut, and Jovan C. Ardy UCI Intellectual Property, Arts, and Technology Clinic Tisha Turk University of Minnesota, Morris IN OPPOSITION Ben Sheffner Motion Picture Association … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 1201 hearings, copyright, drm, fanworks, LA, streamlined video exemption 1201
Leave a comment
1201 exemption hearing: filmmaking and ebooks
PROPOSED CLASS 1: Audiovisual Works—Criticism and Comment—E-Books and Filmmaking Michael C. Donaldson, FilmIndependent, International Documentary Association, Kartemquin Educational Films, Inc., Independent Filmmaker Project, University of Film and Video Association, The Alliance for Media Arts+Culture (“Joint Filmmakers”): Discusses use of film … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 1201 exemption hearing: filmmaking and ebooks 1201, copyright, dmca, drm, fanworks
Leave a comment
Copyright Office issues 1201 report
Available here. It’s a lot to go through, but on first inspection they seem to be trying to address persistent problems, though in the main not by accepting the advice that participants had for them (like scheduling 1201 exemption proposals … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Copyright Office issues 1201 report 1201, drm
Leave a comment
1201 roundtable, evidentiary and procedural issues in rulemaking process
SESSION 2 Rulemaking Process – Evidentiary and Procedural Issues This session will explore the general operation of the triennial rulemaking process under section 1201, including the evidentiary showing required for an exemption, and the procedural aspects of the rulemaking. Andrew … Continue reading
1201 roundtable, relation of 1201 to infringement, consumers, and competition
Copyright Office, 1201 Roundtable, DC James Madison Building, Mumford Room NB: I won’t be here tomorrow because the Office had the temerity to schedule the roundtables after I committed to a different exiting roundtable, this one at Notre Dame on … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 1201 roundtable, and competition 1201, consumers, copyright, dmca, drm, relation of 1201 to infringement
Leave a comment
Nook shuts down in UK; another reason to hate DRM
But UK customers might get to keep access to certain books they “bought,” if all goes well. As usual, xkcd had it right years ago. from Blogger http://ift.tt/21XgGao
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged dmca, drm, Nook shuts down in UK; another reason to hate DRM 1201
Leave a comment
DMCA doesn’t block reverse engineering of vehicle diagnosis software but TM might
Ford Motor Co. v. Autel US Inc., No.14-13760 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 3015) Apart from cars and trucks, Ford sells automotive repair products. Among them is Ford’s Integrated Diagnostic System (IDS system) which diagnoses potential problems with Ford vehicles … Continue reading
More on VW and the DMCA
NPR has a short piece here. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1iFLvik
Initial comments on 1201: fixing what’s broken
I’ve been reading through the initial comments on 1201 for the Copyright Office’s inquiry. One overarching thought: current “winners”—successful exemption proponents—unanimously say the current process is broken. Current losers—unsuccessful exemption opponents—occasionally express openness to minor tweaks, such as a meaningless … Continue reading →