-
Recent Posts
- Are surcharge disclosures fair?
- Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
- court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
- alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
- Great balls of fire: lawsuit over malt sold looking nearly identical to whisky can continue
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Are surcharge disclosures fair?
Seen on a recent menu. They reprinted it to include this information; they could have reprinted with the actual higher prices, and if they ever intend to drop the surcharge they’ll have to reprint again, so the only motivation seems … Continue reading
Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
Hardy v. Olé Mexican Foods, Inc., 2023 WL 3577867, No. 22-1805 (2d Cir. May 22, 2023) (per curiam) There was a CD Cal case raising the same “false Mexican origin” claims with a different result. Hardy alleged that defendant’s La … Continue reading
court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. v. Timeshare Lawyers P.A., 2023 WL 3510374, No. 20-24681-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. May 17, 2023) The court grants these timeshare plaintiffs’ motion for a bench trial, ruling that the Seventh Amendment doesn’t guarantee a jury trial in … Continue reading
alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
New Vision Unlimited, LLC v. Glasses USA, Inc., 2023 WL 3535386, No. 22-22534-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. May 18, 2023) New Vision, an eye-care professional and provider of optical goods and services, including contact lens fittings and contact lens sales with seven … Continue reading
Great balls of fire: lawsuit over malt sold looking nearly identical to whisky can continue
McKay v. Sazerac Co., 23-cv-00522-EMC (N.D. Cal. May 17, 2023) The court rejected Sazerac’s motion to dismiss McKay’s usual California statutory and common law claims on behalf of a putative class based on Sazerac’s labeling and marketing of mini bottles … Continue reading
Second Circuit signals some minimal flexibility on Polaroid analysis in another strip club false endorsement case
Souza v. Exotic Island Enters., Inc., 2023 WL 3556053, No. 21-2149-cv, — F.4th —- (2d Cir. May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare false advertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the … Continue reading
court allows some claims based on allegedly misleading statistical claims for pregnancy test: Bayes’ Theorem in the courts
In re Natera Prenatal Testing Litig., No. 22-cv-00985-JST, 2023 WL 3370737, — F. Supp. 3d – (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2023) Natera sells Panorama, a noninvasive prenatal testing (“NIPT”) product which screens for an array of fetal chromosomal and genetic … Continue reading
courts continue to jack up materiality requirements; the Lanham Act and the death of common sense?
Delta T LLC v. MacroAir Technologies, Inc., No. EDCV 20-1489-GW-JPRx, 2022 WL 19827572 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2022) MacroAir asserted – among other things – a counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. Of potential note: Plaintiff aka BAF … Continue reading
copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching
Roblox Corp. v. Wowwee Gp. Ltd., 2023 WL 2433970, — F. Supp. 3d –, No. 22-cv-04476-SI (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023) Roblox runs a “digital world where users create virtual games and experiences and connect with other users.” Users interact … Continue reading
court doesn’t find consumer protection claim over “sweet cream” plausible without survey; dictionaries insufficient
Sneed v. Ferrero U.S.A., Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 22 CV 1183, 2023 WL 2019049 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 15, 2023) Courts in consumer protection cases reject surveys with abandon when they don’t agree with the results, but may also demand … Continue reading
Rebecca Tushnet 