Category Archives: standing

Native American Arts lacks standing to sue under IACA

Native American Arts, Inc. v. Peter Stone Co., 2015 WL 3561439, — F. Supp. 3d –, No. 08 C 3908 (N.D. Ill. June 9, 2015) (magistrate judge)   NAA sued Stone under the Indian Arts and Crafts Act (IACA), which … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

Restitution available for false discounts even if goods were ok

Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp., 2015 WL 1526559, No. SA CV 12–0215 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)   Spann brought the usual claims against JCP based on purchases she made shopping the sale racks. She believed that she was getting … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies, standing | Leave a comment

Even post-Lexmark, Lanham Act isn’t for garden variety defamation claims

Mitchell v. Sanchez, No. 14–0996–CV, 2015 WL 1393266 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 25, 2015)   Mitchell alleged that defendants incorrectly stated on various media broadcasts that she had AIDS/HIV. She sued for violation of the Lanham Act, invasion of privacy and … Continue reading

Posted in defamation, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

Wannabe competitor lacks standing to challenge false advertising

Maine Springs, LLC v. Nestlé Waters North America, Inc., 2015 WL 1241571, No. 2:14–cv–00321 (D. Me. Mar. 18, 2015)   Maine Springs was founded seven years ago to start a bottled water operation in Poland Spring, Maine. Maine Springs owned … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption, standing | Leave a comment

UDRP expenses count as injury for purposes of TM case

Migliore & Associates, LLC v. Kentuckiana Reporters, LLC, No. 3:13–CV–315, 2015 WL 730058 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 19, 2015)   Note: a genuine pleasure to read! Thank you, Judge Heyburn. Migliore, a court reporter, sued Kentuckiana for trademark infringement and ACPA … Continue reading

Posted in acpa, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing, trademark | Leave a comment

Dastar doesn’t bar true reverse passing off claim

Luxul Technology Inc. v. NectarLux, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 352048, No. 14-CV-03656 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)   Luxul makes LED products. Its patented EazyLux LED tube lamps can replace fluorescent tube lamps without rewiring. The parties contracted … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing, trademark | Leave a comment

No standing for injunction-only class

Graiser v. Visionworks of America, 2015 WL 248003, No. 1:14–CV–01641 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2015)   Graiser sought an injunction on behalf of a putative class based on his false advertising claims, which alleged that Visionworks’s buy one get one … Continue reading

Posted in class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies, standing | Leave a comment

B&N almost entirely off the hook for copying backpack design

Rubio v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2014 WL 6769150, No. 14–CV–6561 (S.D.N.Y Nov. 11, 2014) Rubio sued her alma mater, the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) and Barnes & Noble, Inc. for copying her original drawing of a backpack, producing … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, right of publicity, standing, trademark, unfairness | Leave a comment

unauthorized photo use doesn’t create false advertising claim for photo owners

Avalos v. IAC/Interactive Corp., No. 13-CV-8351 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2014) Meltech, a web design and modeling company, sued defendants for allegedly unauthorized use of photos of models in fake online dating profiles on dating sites (e.g., Match.com, Chemistry.com, and OkCupid.com).  … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption, right of publicity, standing, trademark | Leave a comment

Allegedly false inventorship/ownership claim could be false advertising

Parallel Synthesis Technologies, Inc. v. DeRisi, 2014 WL 4748611, No. 5:13-cv-05968 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2014) (magistrate judge) Plaintiff Parallel, allegedly “seduced by the potential for a long-term partnership,” shared its proprietary Parallume assay with DeRisi, a professor of biochemistry … Continue reading

Posted in dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment