Category Archives:

Pure mourning: Pom fails to get preliminary injunction again

Pom Wonderful LLC v.  Pur Beverages LLC, No. 13-cv-06917 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2015)    Pom fares no better its second time around. Although the court of appeals previously found likely confusion between its marks and defendant’s “pūr pŏm” energy … Continue reading

Posted in, trademark | Leave a comment

11th Circuit recognizes contributory false advertising theory

Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., — F.3d —- (2015), 2015 WL 4709573, No. 14–11853 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2015)   Plaintiff DFA operates duty free stores in many international airports nationwide.  It sued Estée Lauder, arguing … Continue reading

Posted in, secondary liability, tortious interference | Leave a comment

Noncommercial speaker can’t get fees for successfully defending Lanham Act claim

Tobinick v. Novella, 2015 WL 4698549,  NO. 9:14–CV–80781  (S.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2015)   The defendant Society for Science–Based Medicine, Inc., whichwon dismissal of Lanham Act claims against it, moved for attorneys’ fees, and the court denied the motion.  The … Continue reading

Posted in fees, | Leave a comment

Be very afraid: another court refuses to find irreparable harm despite confusion

Williams v. Green Valley RV, Inc., 2015 WL 4694075, No. 8:15–CV–01010 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2015)   Basically, in the Ninth Circuit, you might not be able to get a preliminary injunction in a trademark case unless the defendant’s quality … Continue reading

Posted in, trademark | Leave a comment

overclaiming study results to apply to unstudied product can be false/misleading

In re Riddell Concussion Reduction Litig., No. 13–7585, 2015 WL 4640425 (D.N.J. Aug. 3, 2015)   The plaintiffs sued Riddell for marketing football helmets based on allegedly false or misleading claims that the helmets were equipped with unique concussion reduction … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, | Leave a comment

7th Amendment provides jury right for TM profits as proxy for damages

Black & Decker Corp. v. Positec USA Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 4656749, No. 11–cv–5426 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 5, 2015   The parties compete to sell power tools.  B&D alleged that Positec infringed their patents and trademarks in the … Continue reading

Posted in, trademark | Leave a comment

IPSC: closing comments

Closing Plenary Session   Joshua Sarnoff, DePaul University College of Law: Size affects nature of presentation, time, allotted, depth of development, audience participation.  Makes a personal promise to read papers in sessions he plans to go to—thinks that this will … Continue reading

Posted in | Leave a comment