Tag Archives: trademark

plaintiff delay affects irreparable harm and balance of equities where third parties rely on defendant

Pulling Guard Prods., LLC v. Lambert, No. 26-CV-2305 (PJS/LIB), 2026 WL 1481302 (D. Minn. May 27, 2026) Plaintiff made a “strong showing” that defendants’ “Minnesota Monsters” name and branding infringe its “Duluth Harbor Monsters” mark, though it didn’t show likely … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reminder: Penn/NYU/Harvard Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2026: submit by June 1

Penn/NYU/Harvard Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2026 The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place this year at NYU. Now in its fifth year, the Roundtable is designed … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar

Really wanted a Sweeney Todd reference here but couldn’t figure it out. Osteria Segreto, LLC v. Hilgers, No. 8:26-cv-00065-BCB-MDN (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2026) Osteria Segreto, formerly “an Italian speakeasy” in a space that had once been a hair salon, restyled … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar

Really wanted a Sweeney Todd reference here but couldn’t figure it out. Osteria Segreto, LLC v. Hilgers, No. 8:26-cv-00065-BCB-MDN (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2026) Osteria Segreto, formerly “an Italian speakeasy” in a space that had once been a hair salon, restyled … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A thin record prevents ruling on a thin copyright

Viann’K Mansur LLC v. Estiloisabella LLC, 2026 WL 952416, No. H-23-2914 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026) “The parties in this case sell elaborate ball gowns for quinceanera parties, the celebration of a Latin American girl’s fifteenth birthday.” Defendant Etilolsabella LLC, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

the continuing merger of TM and the right of publicity: court can’t tell the defenses apart

Upper Deck Co. v. Pixels.com LLC, No. 3:24-cv-00923-BAS-DEB, 2026 WL 776227 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026) Eric Goldman’s discussion. Upper Deck makes sports memorabilia (including sports player trading cards), and has exclusive licensing agreements with various athletes, including famous basketball … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Netflix’s promotion of fictional team does not constitute trademark use

Pepperdine University v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-01429-CV (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2026) After denying the motion for preliminary injunction, the court finally tosses Pepperdine’s lawsuit based on use of a fictional Waves team in a Netflix show. Rogers applies … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

naked licensing could constitute false advertising of origin

Epson America, Inc. v. Global Aiptek Inc., 2025 WL 4631973, No. 8:23-cv-00222-FWS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2025) Epson alleged that defendant GAI purposefully and deceptively inflated the lumen and brand specifications of its projectors in violation of the Lanham Act … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

former TM owner states valid damages claim against licensee of current TM owner that drove it out of business via infringement

Wagner Zip-Change, Inc. v. Tubelitedenco, No. 23 C 05077, 2026 WL 673148 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 10, 2026) Wild facts! Wagner was until 2021 in the business of selling sign lettering products, including its trademarked Jewelite Trim (also known as “trim … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

court dismisses vague false advertising counterclaims but allows challenge to Wonderful’s pistachio trade dress

Wonderful Co. v. Nut Cravings Inc., No. 1:21-cv-03960 (MKV), 2026 WL 818073 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2026) Wonderful sued Nut Cravings for infringing its pistachio package trade dress. This opinion deals only with Nut Cravings’ counterclaims, which mostly survive except for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment