-
Recent Posts
- The fact/opinion divide: threat or menace? 9th Cir revives suit against Malwarebytes
- Are surcharge disclosures fair?
- Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
- court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
- alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: March 2019
claim to cure addiction can be false advertising, as can hidden bias
Grasshopper House, LLC v. Clean and Sober Media LLC, 2018 WL 6133710, No. 18-cv-00923-SVW-RAO (C.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2018) This is a dispute about addiction treatment. Counterclaim plaintiff Cliffside alleged that counterdefendant Passages violated the Lanham Act (1) by maintaining … Continue reading
Amazon case shows profound difference between DMCA safe harbor & 230 immunity
Kangaroo Mfg. Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., No. CV-17-01806-PHX-SPL, 2019 WL 1280945 (D. Ariz. Mar. 20, 2019) The Amazon Chronicles often asks “what is Amazon?” An interesting question to build a law school course around might be “what can Amazon do?” … Continue reading
failure to show damages from literal falsity still allowed injunctive relief
Nutrition Distribution LLC v. IronMag Labs, LLC, No. CV 15-8233-R, 2018 WL 6264986 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2018( “This is a false advertising case between two competitors in the business of selling fitness supplements.” IronMag allegedly unlawfully marketed its products … Continue reading
survey isn’t evidence of actual deception, court says in First Amendment case w/TM relevance
Express Oil Change, L.L.C v. Mississippi Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers & Surveyors, No. 18-60144 (5th Cir. Feb. 19, 2019) Just as a matter of client advocacy, it is time for these First Amendment cases about the government’s near-inability … Continue reading
Star Trekkin’ across the universe of fair use
I like Star Trek better than Dr. Seuss, ok? Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. ComicMix LLC, No. 16-CV-2779 JLS (BGS) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2019) DSE owns the copyrights to the works of Theodor S. Geisel, better known as Dr. … Continue reading
court, while uncomfy with some Amazon techniques, declines to grant PI
Comphy Co. v. Amazon.com, Inc., NO. C18-1460RSM (W.D. Wash. Mar. 12, 2019) The Comphy Company markets itself as a luxury company, historically supplying its linens to luxury spas. Ultimately, Plaintiff decided to start retailing its products online through its own … Continue reading
Apple’s misleading use of “episode” to describe promo clips could lead to liability (w/o its contract)
Zaragoza v. Apple Inc., 2019 WL 1171161, No. 18-cv-06139-PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2019) Plaintiffs sued Apple for how it sells TV seasons on its iTunes store. The home page for each season “provides general information about the season and … Continue reading
Lanham Act claim based on patent threats fails even with invalidation of the patent
American Fireglass v. Moderustic, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2019 WL 1227963, No. 15-CV-2866 JLS (BGS) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2019) The parties compete in the market for pieces of broken tempered glass for use in fireplaces and fire pits (Moderustic … Continue reading
commercial speech requirement defeats Lanham Act claim against competing news channel
Tang v. Guo, No. 17 Civ. 9031 (JFK), 2019 WL 1207859 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2019) Plaintiff Tang is a political activist, author, and “one of the leading Chinese political dissidents.” He currently runs two pro-democracy nonprofit organizations and co-founded the … Continue reading
Expedia’s “sold out” labels and diversionary phone numbers for hotels lead to class certification
Buckeye Tree Lodge & Sequoia Village Inn, LLC v. Expedia, Inc., No. 16-cv-04721-VC, 2019 WL 1170489 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2019) Really interesting false advertising class action, with a smaller-than-plaintiffs-wanted class of hotels certified against Expedia, which offers hotel bookings … Continue reading