Monthly Archives: August 2017

Outlet sales of outlet-only clothes under brand name aren’t inherently deceptive

Posted on August 31, 2017 by rtushnet

Rubenstein v. The Gap, Inc., — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, No. B272356, 2017 WL 3634212 (Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2017) The court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of a claim against the Gap for selling lesser-quality products at its Gap and Banana … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

name alone doesn’t ID average people in internet search ROP case, court rules

Posted on August 31, 2017 by rtushnet

Dobrowolski v. Intelius, Inc., No. 17 CV 1406, 2017 WL 3720170 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 29, 2017) Defendants sell online reports on people using information compiled from public records and other sources.  When a consumer uses a search engine to search … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Comparison to former licensor’s products isn’t trademark infringement

Posted on August 30, 2017 by rtushnet

Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. VWR Int’l, LLC, No. 12-1615, 2017 WL 3671264 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2017) APT sued VWR, a competitor in the market for nonwoven, disposable laboratory apparel for use in clean rooms and similar environments. VWR … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“100% grated parmesan cheese” doesn’t have to be all cheese, court rules

Posted on August 30, 2017 by rtushnet

In re: 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese Marketing & Sales Practices Litig., 2017 WL 3642076, No. 16 C 5802, MDL 2705 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 24, 2017) Ah, implicature, how I wish judges understood you.  A product labeled “100% Grated Parmesan Cheese” … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Advertising question of the day: Honeycrisp or honey crisp?

Posted on August 30, 2017 by rtushnet

Assuming this alcoholic beverage is not made from honeycrisp apples–but that it does contain honey–would the product name be false or misleading?  H/T Adam Levitin.  Note that the manufacturer doesn’t disclose the apple variety one way or another, as far … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“universal” is generic for churches

Posted on August 30, 2017 by rtushnet

Universal Church, Inc. v. Universal Life Church/ULC Monastery,  2017 WL 3669625, No. 14 Civ. 5213 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2017) The Universal Church, Inc., is a Pentecostal/Charismatic church with “around 30,000 members,” while its Brazilian affiliate has millions of members. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

state courts do nominative fair use too

Posted on August 28, 2017 by rtushnet

Instant Infosystems, Inc. v. Open Text, Inc., 2017 WL 3634547, No. B276691 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 24, 2017) Another illustration of the principle that courts don’t like to do two dilution analyses—this state court only talks about federal dilution, assuming … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Plaintiff can’t win false advertising claim because there’s evidence on both sides

Posted on August 28, 2017 by rtushnet

Korolshteyn v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 15-cv-709, 2017 WL 3622226 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2017) Ugh. Costco’s TruNature Gingko labels represent that the product “supports alertness & memory,” that “Gingko biloba can help with mental clarity and memory,” and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Suing critics using copyright doesn’t work

Posted on August 25, 2017 by rtushnet

Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, No. 16-cv-03081 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2017) Hosseinzadeh posts original video content on YouTube, playing a character known as “Bold Guy.” Ethan and Hila Klein criticized “Bold Guy vs. Parkour Girl,” in which the Bold Guy flirts with … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

On the genericity of Velcro/velcro

Posted on August 25, 2017 by rtushnet

Denver’s Science Museum: Note the use of “Velcro,” capitalized, as the generic term for hook-and-loop fasteners, as well as the uncapitalized use in the Spanish translation immediately below. from Blogger http://ift.tt/2waTIDv

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment