-
Recent Posts
- The fact/opinion divide: threat or menace? 9th Cir revives suit against Malwarebytes
- Are surcharge disclosures fair?
- Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
- court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
- alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: conferences
IPSC: Copyright again
Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. Porter, influential across the country. Step 1: actual copying, dissection allowed, expert testimony … Continue reading
IPSC: Other IP
Other IP [Insert wry commentary about “fringe” fields like advertising law] Sarah Burstein, The University of Oklahoma College of Law Reviving Ornamentality Fed. Cir. killed the doctrine. Statute says new, original, and ornamental designs can get a design … Continue reading
Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in different contexts
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark Contexts Do the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? Is assessment of the reaction of the average consumer in trade … Continue reading
ANA conference: litigating Lanham Act damages
Litigating Damages Claims In Lanham Act False Advertising Cases Alexander Kaplan, Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP: Case law on damages can be tricky/inconsistencies between circuits. What’s recoverable? 1117(a): D’s profits; damages sustained by P; costs of action. Statute doesn’t prevent … Continue reading
ANA conference: native advertising
The Natives Are Restless: Legal Perspectives On Native Advertising John P. Feldman, Partner, Reed Smith LLP: ads have been considered deceptive for not disclosing they are ads/source. Native ads = sponsored content formatted to fit seamlessly into modern media. … Continue reading
ANA conference: surveys
What Do Consumers Think? Using Online Surveys To Demonstrate Implied Claims David G. Mallen, Co-Chair, Advertising Disputes, Loeb & Loeb LLP: NAD now forum of choice for many ad challenges, especially since the standard of proof is different for … Continue reading
WIPIP, Part 2, Session 2, Trademark
Glynn Lunney, Inefficient Trademark Law Older TM lawyer would be surprised at breadth: inherently distinctive marks were the only marks, and double identity was essentially the rule. Today: looks very different. What will it look like in 100 years—will … Continue reading
AU trademark works in progress day 2
Dan Hunter (with Irene Calboli), Trademark Proliferation Concerns about too many marks. They’re extremely weak as a result. It’s easy to get a descriptive mark on the primary register w/o secondary meaning. Also: many “marks” don’t seem distinctive as to … Continue reading
SCIPR: false advertising
Lexmark Int’l v. Static Control Components (Standard for determining standing for false advertising claim under the Lanham Act.) POM Wonderful v. Coca-Cola (Standing under the Lanham Act to challenge food or beverage label as false or misleading though regulated by … Continue reading
SCIPR: Petrella v. MGM
Petrella v. MGM (Can laches bar a copyright claim within the 3 year statute of limitations?) Moderator: Scott McBride, Shareholder, McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd. Panelists: Paula Petrella, Petitioner and owner of rights to the screenplay (only individual plaintiff in … Continue reading