Monthly Archives: February 2018

WIPIP concurrent 3 (most of it)

Annemarie Bridy, Fearless Girl Meets Charging Bull: Copyright and the Regulation of Intertextuality DiModica (who made Charging Bull) complained that Fearless Girl’s placement created an unauthorized derivative work and violated VARA by being a material alteration that prejudiced his honor—Charging … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Concurrent 2

Nancy Kim, The License v. Sale Puzzle after Impressions v. Lexmark Sales exhaust the patentee’s rights to any item regardless of what the contract says. But restrictions on licensees are different because a license doesn’t implicate the same concerns about … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP panel one: TM tarnishment and (c)

[title fixed because I can’t keep seasons straight] Suneal Bedi, Bad Brands: Experimental Studies in Trademark Tarnishment What is the reputation of a mark?  Working on PhD in marketing at Penn; marketing is the best discipline to answer this Q.  … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP: Opening plenary

WIPIP Plenary [Standard disclaimer: these are just my notes; I miss stuff or it’s about patents and I don’t necessarily get it; I also have to pick and choose from many attractive panels and this year I’m only at the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

court awards sanctions for misrepresenting website as independent review site in false advertising case

Purple Innovation, LLC v. Honest Reviews, LLC, 2018 WL 840035, No. 17-cv-138 (D. Utah Feb. 12, 2018) A rare sanctions order in a false advertising case, in which the court grants sanctions based on the defendants’ submission of misleading and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Settlements allowing competitors to use term doesn’t insulate Clorox from its own possible deception

Gregorio v. Clorox Co., 2018 WL 732673, No. 17-cv-03824 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2018) Gregorio alleged that, to capitalize on consumer demand for “natural” home cleaning products, Clorox falsely advertised its “Green Works” cleaning products as “natural” or “naturally derived.” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

TrueNorth not truly famous, court rules on motion to dismiss

TrueNorth Companies, L.C. v. TruNorth Warranty Plans, LLC, No. C17-31, 2018 WL 794700 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 8, 2018) TrueNorth sued TruNorth for trademark infringement and dilution based on their respective marks; here the court dismisses the dilution claim for failure … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment