Tag Archives: standing

would-be competitor lacks Lanham Act standing

Posted on October 13, 2026 by rtushnet

Onego Bio Inc. v. Clara Foods Co., 2026 WL 3033777, No. 1:25-cv-01131-JDW (D. Del. Oct. 9, 2026) Onega Bio sought a declaratory judgment that defendant EVERY’s patent covering recombinant ovalbumin protein was invalid and unenforceable and that Onego didn’t not … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

competitor lacks standing under Cal. law because it didn’t rely on alleged misrepresentations; its customers did

Posted on May 27, 2026 by rtushnet

Kachuck Enters. v. Mission Produce, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 216475, No. 2:25-cv-01523-AH-JCx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2026) This was a putative class action about alleged misrepresentations made by distributors and suppliers of Mexican-grown avocados that their avocados are … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Lanham Act requires less in the way of injury from competitors than California FAL/UCL

Posted on May 22, 2026 by rtushnet

Eight Sleep Inc. v. Orion Longevity Inc., 2026 WL 1243359, No. 2:26-cv-02460-SB-KS (C.D. Cal. May 4, 2026) Eight Sleep “developed and patented the Eight Sleep Pod, a ‘bio-tracking mattress cover’ that optimizes sleep by using biometric measurements to automatically adjust … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

sitting by designation, Judge Bibas says there’s no de minimis exception to Lanham Act false advertising

Posted on December 9, 2025 by rtushnet

Montway LLC v. Navi Transport Services LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 3151403, No. 25-cv-00381-SB (D. Del. Nov. 11, 2025) Judge Bibas either likes sitting by designation or is willing to take one for the team; here’s another of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

allegedly false claims for compounded weight loss drugs didn’t plausibly threaten Eli Lilly’s reputation

Posted on October 28, 2025 by rtushnet

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mochi Health Corp., 2025 WL 2998166, No. 25-cv-03534-JSC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2025) Another of the cases in which Eli Lilly’s attempts to protect its GLP-antagonist market do surprisingly badly, once again highlighting the higher … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

general competitor has Lanham Act standing even if it doesn’t compete in alleged false advertiser’s subcategory

Posted on September 4, 2025 by rtushnet

Colorado Biolabs, Inc. v. Three Arrows Nutra, LLC, No. 3:25-CV-0601-D, 2025 WL 2524313 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2025) CBL sued Three Arrows for breach of a settlement agreement and related claims; Three Arrows counterclaimed along similar lines. The parties sell … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

5th Circuit agrees that joint TM owners can’t sue each other under any Lanham Act theory

Posted on July 4, 2025 by rtushnet

Reed v. Marshall, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 1822673, No. 24-20198 (5th Cir. Jul. 2, 2025) Jade, an R&B, hip hop, and soul vocal group, rose to prominence in the 1990s. Jade disbanded in 1995, when the members began pursuing … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

honey producers have statutory standing to challenge Bayer’s claims to direct purchasers that herbicides were safe

Posted on March 26, 2025 by rtushnet

Coy’s Honey Farm, Inc. v. Bayer Corp., MDL No.:1:18-md-02820-SNLJ, No. 1:21-CV-089-SNLJ, 2025 WL 901264 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 25, 2025) Coy’s s a beekeeping and honey-producing operation. It alleged that dicamba-based herbicide products, including those produced by defendants, moved away from … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

National Republican Senatorial Committee loses ROP/Lanham Act/UCL claims against alleged “Scam PAC”

Posted on March 20, 2025 by rtushnet

National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Red Senate, 2025 WL 819711, No. 8:24-cv-02301-JVS-KES (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2025) NRSC sued Red State, alleging that it was exploiting Senator Rick Scott’s “name, image, and likeness without his consent to deceive and scam … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

discovery rule applies to false “reference price” allegations at outlet stores

Posted on March 17, 2025 by rtushnet

Clark v. Eddie Bauer LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 814924, No. 2:20-cv-01106-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Mar. 12, 2025) A good choice for publication given that the opinion addresses (and rejects) some arguments I haven’t seen before. Clark sued Eddie Bauer … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment