Monthly Archives: May 2017

Certified party lacks standing to challenge certifier’s claims to fairness

Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc, 2015 WL 13159050, No. 13-00871 (D.D.C. Jul. 6, 2015) Westlaw’s impenetrable algorithm threw this up, and I’m blogging it now because of the relatively rare discussion of direct causation under Lexmark.  … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Free to good home: parody t-shirts

I’m cutting down on my collection a bit as I move.  Let me know if anyone wants these: Moose/Batman logo; 2 priceless tees; “Lacoste Intolerant” Beer parody Campbell’s, Seuss, Starbucks, Morton Salt; pole lamp not included ETA: dug out more … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

9th Circuit accepts irreparable harm finding in TM licensee breach case

2Die4Kourt v. Hillair Capital Management, LLC, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2017 WL 2304376, No. 16-56217 (9th Cir. May 26, 2017)  The district court enjoined Hillair from using trademarks/publicity rights owned by 2Die4Kourt, Kimsaprincess, Inc., Khlomoney, Inc., Kourtney Kardashian, Kim Kardashian West, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Fee award justified in case involving fraud on the PTO

Amusement Art, LLC v. Life is Beautiful, LLC, 2017 WL 2259672, No. 2-14-cv-08290 (C.D. Cal. May 23, 2017) Initial ruling discussed here.  Defendant LIB hosts the Life is Beautiful festival in Las Vegas, Nevada—an annual event that features music, art, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

high-tech look can’t fool reasonable consumers about orthotics

Kommer v. Bayer Consumer Health, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2017 WL 2231162, 16 Civ. 1560 (S.D.N.Y. May 18, 2017) Bayer sells Dr. Scholl’s foot care products, including the Dr. Scholl’s Custom Fit Orthotics Inserts. In many stores, they are sold alongside … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A box size whopper? Slack fill claims for candy continue

Bratton v. Hershey Co., 2017 WL 2126864, No. 16–cv–4322 (W.D. Mo. May 16, 2017) Bratton sued over alleged slack fill in Reese’s Pieces and Whoppers candy boxes.  He alleged that: Consumers spend an average of 13 seconds making an in-store … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Suing for false advertising as abuse of process

Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. v. Scranton Products, Inc., 2017 WL 2126320, No. 14-CV-00853 (M.D. Pa. May 16, 2017) In May 2014 SP sued Bobrick, alleging that it “carefully orchestrated a campaign to scare architects, product specifiers, procurement representatives, building owners, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

coffee cup lid trade dress survives functionality challenge

If I have the right image of the defendant’s coffee cup lid, this is a good example of the difficulties separating scope from validity: the challenged design is noticeably different from the registered design, and it seems to me that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Reading list: Shakespeare’s literary disputes

Bonus points for beginning with a great Hamlet quote (the best use of which I ever saw was a production that arranged the scenes so that when Hamlet disparages what he’s reading as “words, words, words” he is reading his … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

New article: fixing incontestability

With apologies to John Welch, who hates the term. Fixing Incontestability: The Next Frontier? Boston University journal of Science and Technology Law, Forthcoming Abstract Incontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment