-
Recent Posts
- PediaSure “growth” claims might communicate height gain, but price premium theory fails
- 6th Circuit approves of using (at least) same similarity standard for dilution as for confusion
- Promoting Progress part 2 at AU WCL
- Promoting Progress: 50 Years of the Copyright Act from the Perspective of the Public Interest
- Second Annual Aspiring Free Speech Scholars Workshop
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
PediaSure “growth” claims might communicate height gain, but price premium theory fails
Noriega v. Abbott Labs., 2026 WL 1601501, No. 23 Civ. 4014 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 4, 2026) Conventional wisdom is that certification is the ballgame for consumer class actions, but it might be empirically mistaken. This case is an example where … Continue reading
court allows TM and false advertising claims against “toxic backlink” SEO disparagement campaign (SEM, for minimization?)
Montway LLC v. Nexus AT LLC, 2026 WL 1552185, No. 25 C 13100, No. 26 C 1056 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 2, 2026) Although the UCL unfair competition claims got kicked out, federal trademark and false advertising claims survive in this … Continue reading
Instagram disparagement by alleged competitor isn’t commercial speech
Farina v. Omari, No. 24-11098 (SDW) (AME), 2026 WL 1552256 (D.N.J. Jun. 2, 2026) The court grants a motion to dismiss in this defamation/false advertising claim centered on online videos. “Farina is a consultant in the aesthetic surgery industry and … Continue reading
Reading list: Deception wins at the Federal Circuit
“A doctrine that was meant to deter deception thus rewards its most sophisticated form: technically accurate fragments presented as universal facts.” This student article shows how the Federal Circuit allowed two layers of deceptive advertising: advertising results from p-hacking, without … Continue reading
9th Circuit applies Dastar to bar false advertising liability based on “first to market” claims
Vericool World, LLC v. Igloo Products Corp., No. 24-192, 2026 WL 1239879, — F.4th —- (9th Cir. May 6, 2026) Judge Bumatay dissented from this decision extending Dastar to bar Lanham Act false advertising claims over who was “first” to … Continue reading
claim that entity sells unapproved drugs does not misrepresent “origin, sponsorship, or approval” for Lanham Act purposes
Peptide Tech LLC v. Avidia Bank, 2026 WL 1506049, No. 25-13179-MJJ (D. Mass. May 28, 2026) Plaintiff sells peptides; Avidia is a bank and acquiring bank for merchants who accept credit and debit card payments. Doe defendants allegedly reported Peptide … Continue reading
a bot maybe accessed a former employer’s trade secrets; larger trade secret/false advertising issues ensure employer’s victory
Capconvert, LLC v. Brown, 2026 WL 1471880, No. 26-cv-02149-CRB (N.D. Cal. May 26, 2026) Capconvert sued its former employee Brown primarily over alleged misappropriation of Capconvert’s trade secrets and confidential information for use in a competing business venture involving search … Continue reading
Igloo must face biodegradability/recycled content/made in USA consumer claims
Lieber v. Igloo Products Corp., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 266301, No. 25-CV-488 (ARR) (LKE) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2026) I’ll get to the Igloo 9th Circuit case eventually. This case is a putative consumer class action against Igloo, alleging that … Continue reading
competitor lacks standing under Cal. law because it didn’t rely on alleged misrepresentations; its customers did
Kachuck Enters. v. Mission Produce, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 216475, No. 2:25-cv-01523-AH-JCx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2026) This was a putative class action about alleged misrepresentations made by distributors and suppliers of Mexican-grown avocados that their avocados are … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged california, consumer protection, false advertising, standing
Leave a comment
despite some skepticism, court mostly allows adtech vendor’s disparagement claims against competitor to proceed
Double Verify Holdings, Inc. v. Adalytics Research, LLC, No. 25-1535-TDC, 2026 WL 1133411 (D. Md. Apr. 27, 2026) DoubleVerify is in the business of “helping brands, agencies, and publishers verify that their digital advertising investments are delivered as intended.” Its … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, disparagement, false advertising, tortious interference
Leave a comment