Tag Archives: false advertising

court allows TM and false advertising claims against “toxic backlink” SEO disparagement campaign (SEM, for minimization?)

Montway LLC v. Nexus AT LLC, 2026 WL 1552185, No. 25 C 13100, No. 26 C 1056 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 2, 2026) Although the UCL unfair competition claims got kicked out, federal trademark and false advertising claims survive in this … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Instagram disparagement by alleged competitor isn’t commercial speech

Farina v. Omari, No. 24-11098 (SDW) (AME), 2026 WL 1552256 (D.N.J. Jun. 2, 2026) The court grants a motion to dismiss in this defamation/false advertising claim centered on online videos. “Farina is a consultant in the aesthetic surgery industry and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Reading list: Deception wins at the Federal Circuit

 “A doctrine that was meant to deter deception thus rewards its most sophisticated form: technically accurate fragments presented as universal facts.” This student article shows how the Federal Circuit allowed two layers of deceptive advertising: advertising results from p-hacking, without … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit applies Dastar to bar false advertising liability based on “first to market” claims

Vericool World, LLC v. Igloo Products Corp., No. 24-192, 2026 WL 1239879, — F.4th —- (9th Cir. May 6, 2026) Judge Bumatay dissented from this decision extending Dastar to bar Lanham Act false advertising claims over who was “first” to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

claim that entity sells unapproved drugs does not misrepresent “origin, sponsorship, or approval” for Lanham Act purposes

Peptide Tech LLC v. Avidia Bank, 2026 WL 1506049, No. 25-13179-MJJ (D. Mass. May 28, 2026) Plaintiff sells peptides; Avidia is a bank and acquiring bank for merchants who accept credit and debit card payments. Doe defendants allegedly reported Peptide … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

a bot maybe accessed a former employer’s trade secrets; larger trade secret/false advertising issues ensure employer’s victory

Capconvert, LLC v. Brown, 2026 WL 1471880, No. 26-cv-02149-CRB (N.D. Cal. May 26, 2026) Capconvert sued its former employee Brown primarily over alleged misappropriation of Capconvert’s trade secrets and confidential information for use in a competing business venture involving search … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Igloo must face biodegradability/recycled content/made in USA consumer claims

Lieber v. Igloo Products Corp., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 266301, No. 25-CV-488 (ARR) (LKE) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2026) I’ll get to the Igloo 9th Circuit case eventually. This case is a putative consumer class action against Igloo, alleging that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

competitor lacks standing under Cal. law because it didn’t rely on alleged misrepresentations; its customers did

Kachuck Enters. v. Mission Produce, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 216475, No. 2:25-cv-01523-AH-JCx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2026) This was a putative class action about alleged misrepresentations made by distributors and suppliers of Mexican-grown avocados that their avocados are … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

despite some skepticism, court mostly allows adtech vendor’s disparagement claims against competitor to proceed

Double Verify Holdings, Inc. v. Adalytics Research, LLC, No. 25-1535-TDC, 2026 WL 1133411 (D. Md. Apr. 27, 2026) DoubleVerify is in the business of “helping brands, agencies, and publishers verify that their digital advertising investments are delivered as intended.” Its … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit reverses dismissal where plaintiff plausibly alleges that an ingredient is non-natural flavoring

Trammell v. KLN Enterprises, Inc., No. 24-6097 (9th Cir. May 15, 2026) Perfect summary: The defendant company in this case represented to consumers that its berry snacks product contained no artificial flavors. The plaintiff bought the product believing the representation … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment