-
Recent Posts
- court allows TM and false advertising claims against “toxic backlink” SEO disparagement campaign (SEM, for minimization?)
- Instagram disparagement by alleged competitor isn’t commercial speech
- Reading list: Deception wins at the Federal Circuit
- 9th Circuit applies Dastar to bar false advertising liability based on “first to market” claims
- claim that entity sells unapproved drugs does not misrepresent “origin, sponsorship, or approval” for Lanham Act purposes
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
court allows TM and false advertising claims against “toxic backlink” SEO disparagement campaign (SEM, for minimization?)
Montway LLC v. Nexus AT LLC, 2026 WL 1552185, No. 25 C 13100, No. 26 C 1056 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 2, 2026) Although the UCL unfair competition claims got kicked out, federal trademark and false advertising claims survive in this … Continue reading
Instagram disparagement by alleged competitor isn’t commercial speech
Farina v. Omari, No. 24-11098 (SDW) (AME), 2026 WL 1552256 (D.N.J. Jun. 2, 2026) The court grants a motion to dismiss in this defamation/false advertising claim centered on online videos. “Farina is a consultant in the aesthetic surgery industry and … Continue reading
Reading list: Deception wins at the Federal Circuit
“A doctrine that was meant to deter deception thus rewards its most sophisticated form: technically accurate fragments presented as universal facts.” This student article shows how the Federal Circuit allowed two layers of deceptive advertising: advertising results from p-hacking, without … Continue reading
9th Circuit applies Dastar to bar false advertising liability based on “first to market” claims
Vericool World, LLC v. Igloo Products Corp., No. 24-192, 2026 WL 1239879, — F.4th —- (9th Cir. May 6, 2026) Judge Bumatay dissented from this decision extending Dastar to bar Lanham Act false advertising claims over who was “first” to … Continue reading
claim that entity sells unapproved drugs does not misrepresent “origin, sponsorship, or approval” for Lanham Act purposes
Peptide Tech LLC v. Avidia Bank, 2026 WL 1506049, No. 25-13179-MJJ (D. Mass. May 28, 2026) Plaintiff sells peptides; Avidia is a bank and acquiring bank for merchants who accept credit and debit card payments. Doe defendants allegedly reported Peptide … Continue reading
a bot maybe accessed a former employer’s trade secrets; larger trade secret/false advertising issues ensure employer’s victory
Capconvert, LLC v. Brown, 2026 WL 1471880, No. 26-cv-02149-CRB (N.D. Cal. May 26, 2026) Capconvert sued its former employee Brown primarily over alleged misappropriation of Capconvert’s trade secrets and confidential information for use in a competing business venture involving search … Continue reading
Igloo must face biodegradability/recycled content/made in USA consumer claims
Lieber v. Igloo Products Corp., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 266301, No. 25-CV-488 (ARR) (LKE) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2026) I’ll get to the Igloo 9th Circuit case eventually. This case is a putative consumer class action against Igloo, alleging that … Continue reading
competitor lacks standing under Cal. law because it didn’t rely on alleged misrepresentations; its customers did
Kachuck Enters. v. Mission Produce, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 216475, No. 2:25-cv-01523-AH-JCx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2026) This was a putative class action about alleged misrepresentations made by distributors and suppliers of Mexican-grown avocados that their avocados are … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged california, consumer protection, false advertising, standing
Leave a comment
despite some skepticism, court mostly allows adtech vendor’s disparagement claims against competitor to proceed
Double Verify Holdings, Inc. v. Adalytics Research, LLC, No. 25-1535-TDC, 2026 WL 1133411 (D. Md. Apr. 27, 2026) DoubleVerify is in the business of “helping brands, agencies, and publishers verify that their digital advertising investments are delivered as intended.” Its … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, disparagement, false advertising, tortious interference
Leave a comment
9th Circuit reverses dismissal where plaintiff plausibly alleges that an ingredient is non-natural flavoring
Trammell v. KLN Enterprises, Inc., No. 24-6097 (9th Cir. May 15, 2026) Perfect summary: The defendant company in this case represented to consumers that its berry snacks product contained no artificial flavors. The plaintiff bought the product believing the representation … Continue reading