Tag Archives: false advertising

Novo struggles once again to allege deception by sellers of compounded drugs

Novo Nordisk v. Zealthy Inc., 2026 WL 2212889, No. 25-cv-06391 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2026) Novo Nordisk makes the FDA-approved Ozempic, Rybelsus, and Wegovy, while Zealthy markets and facilitates access to drug products, including compounded medications containing semaglutide. Novo alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FDCA mostly preempts claims against ineffective decongestant

Yousefzadeh v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 2192415, Nos. 24-3296 (L), 25-119 (CON) (2d Cir. Jul. 30, 2026) Oral phenylephrine (oral PE), used in popular products as Nyquil Severe Cold & Flu, Advil Sinus Congestion … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

interactive website offering illegal-in-CT ghost guns wasn’t covered by CUTPA, but any sales were

Connecticut v. Indie Guns LLC, NO. (X06) UWY-CV23-6072307S, 2026 WL 2322641 (Ct. Super. Ct. Aug. 6, 2026) The state sued Indie Guns for selling illegal ghost guns into Connecticut. Indie Guns defaulted, but the court only granted partial default judgment—merely … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Foiled: Reynolds must face “Made in USA” class

Washington v. Reynolds Consumer Products LLC, No. 1:24-cv-02327-ALC-RFT, 2026 WL 2210008 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 30, 2026) The court certified a class of NY consumers under the NYGBL’s false advertising provisions, based on alleged falsity of aluminum foil that’s sold with a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Beats plausibly deceived consumers with Android feature claims

Saucedo v. Beats Electronics, LLC, 2026 WL 2210908, No. 26-cv-01363-RFL (N.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2026) Saucedo’s California claims against Beats partially survived for alleged misrepresentations about the Android compatibility of its headphones. The Amazon product page allegedly said, “Whether you’re … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

executive liable for false advertising can’t be made to disgorge salary, 9th Circuit rules

Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Casden, 2026 WL 2196259, No. 24-4691, — F.4th —- (9th Cir. Jul. 30, 2026) The parties compete in the market for “bioceramic” athletic wear components that are supposed to enhance the wearer’s circulation, support muscle … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

challenge to FTC’s substantiation requirement isn’t yet ripe

Xlear, Inc. v. U.S. Fed. Trade Comm’n, 2026 WL 2150208, No. 2:25-cv-00484-DBB-CMR (D. Utah Jul. 27, 2026) In 2021, the FTC brought a civil action against Xlear because its COVID-19 claims allegedly lacked substantiation and violated the FTC Act. “Xlear … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Chobani’s “zero sugar” yogurt with allulose violates FDA regs despite FDA’s nonenforcement; 7th Circuit reverses preemption ruling

Franco v. Chobani, LLC, No. 25-2087 (7th Cir. Jul. 27, 2026) Federal law requires that foods advertised as sugar free contain less than a half gram of sugar. Chobani sold Chobani Zero Sugar Yogurt, but it included four grams per … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

false advertising in online games leads to over $700 million award to competitor

Skillz Platform Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., 2026 WL 2151126, No. 24cv1646 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 27, 2026) Some previous opinions (more linked there). At a jury trial, Skillz won a substantial damage award for false advertising about Papaya’s use of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

warnings about effects of “killer acquisitions” on Shopify apps aren’t about tangible characteristics and aren’t factual claims

Jika Inc. v. Loop Solutions, Inc., No. 2:26-CV-05530-JAK (MARx), 2026 WL 2138604 (C.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2026) Jika, d/b/a Skio & Recharge, sued Loop for false advertising/tortious interference/unfair competition/trade libel for ads it ran in response to Recharge’s acquisition of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment