Tag Archives: fda

9th Circuit reverses dismissal where plaintiff plausibly alleges that an ingredient is non-natural flavoring

Trammell v. KLN Enterprises, Inc., No. 24-6097 (9th Cir. May 15, 2026) Perfect summary: The defendant company in this case represented to consumers that its berry snacks product contained no artificial flavors. The plaintiff bought the product believing the representation … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

high sugar content doesn’t make “Breakfast Essentials” name or health claims misleading

Testori v. Nestlé Health Science US Holdings, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 1282540, No. 1:25-cv-01318-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. May 11, 2026) The court dismissed California claims against Carnation Breakfast Essentials Nutritional Drink. The drink label highlighted its 10g of protein … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

compounding pharmacies lose a round with Lilly on personalized medicine and GLP-1 comparison claims

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mochi Health Corp., 2026 WL 1076831, No. 25-cv-03534-JSC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2026) Eli Lilly’s claims were previously dismissed, and Lilly tried again with claims under California’s UCL, Lanham Act false advertising, and civil conspiracy. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

compounding pharmacies lose a round with Lilly on personalized medicine and GLP-1 comparison claims

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mochi Health Corp., 2026 WL 1076831, No. 25-cv-03534-JSC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2026) Eli Lilly’s claims were previously dismissed, and Lilly tried again with claims under California’s UCL, Lanham Act false advertising, and civil conspiracy. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reading list: consumer protection and the industries who regularly sue their regulators

Nicholas R. Parrillo, Administrative Law as a Choice of Business Strategy: Comparing the Industries Who Have Routinely Sued Their Regulators with the Industries Who Rarely Have George Washington Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 5, pp. 1031-1195 (2025)  Abstract: For some … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

claims about scientific studies might imply FDA approval

BioGaia USA, LLC v. Probiotiv Naturals LLC, 2025 WL 2946910, No. CV 25-3592 PA (MBKx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2025) BioGaia sued Probiotiv – a competitor in the sale of priobiotic dietary supplements for oral health, for false advertising; Probiotiv … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

pharmacos face judicial resistance to claims against compounding pharmacies for weight loss drugs

Three cases showing aspects of the challenges, only one of which even partially survives: Novo Nordisk, Inc. v. Brooksville Pharm. Inc., 785 F.Supp.3d 1123 (M.D. Fla. 2025) Novo Nordisk sells FDA-approved drugs containing semaglutide, Wegovy, Ozempic, and Rybelsus. Brooksville is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

mislabeling nut ingredients doesn’t justify class action because not everyone has nut allergies

Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC, No. 23-cv-00099-RFL, 2025 WL 2644747 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2025) Fukaya, who is allergic to tree nuts, alleged that Daiso failed to properly label its pre-packaged food products as containing tree nuts on its English-language … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

court finds unique tracking of units of fluoride products immaterial even if vaguely safety-related

Method Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. H2-Pharma, LLC, 2025 WL 2298395, No. 2:20-cv-753-ECM (M.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2025) Method asked the court to reconsider its ruling granting summary judgment on certain false advertising claims to H2, which sells a fluoride product as … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

P&G’s brand extension ZzzQuil must face lawsuit alleging falsity of its “Non-Habit Forming” claim

Sneed v. Procter & Gamble Company, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1017933, No. 23-cv-05443-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) This case is about a product I recently noticed, “Nighttime Sleep Aid” products containing diphenhydramine hydrochloride as ZzzQuil. Sneed alleged that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment