-
Recent Posts
- Elsevier’s “peer review” claims are commercial advertising, but not shown false or connected to P’s harm
- Quince quashes consumer suit; reasonable consumers must scroll a bit to understand comparison to “traditional retail”
- Google gets 230 protection for fraudulent apps in Google Play
- court refuses to recognize Lanham Act false advertising contributory liability
- Kalshi’s gambling services aren’t so clearly illegal as to make its offerings false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: consumer protection
Quince quashes consumer suit; reasonable consumers must scroll a bit to understand comparison to “traditional retail”
In re Last Brand, Inc. d/b/a Quince Pricing Litig., 2026 WL 3151517, No. 25-cv-09780-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2026) Putative class plaintiffs sued Quince under the consumer protection laws of nine states (California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New … Continue reading
Google’s alleged misrepresentations about sophisticated ad tech weren’t “consumer-oriented” under NY GBL
In Re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litig., Nos. 21-md-3010 (PKC), 21-cv-3446 (PKC), 23-cv-5177 (PKC), 21-cv-7034 (PKC), 23-cv-1530 (PKC), 2026 WL 2942363 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2026) As the caption indicates, this is mostly an antitrust case, which means it’s amazing that … Continue reading
consumer suit against kratom seller proceeds on failure to disclose theory
Cheswick v. Mitra-9 Brands, LLC, 2026 WL 2949413, No. 1:25-CV-6795-LTS (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2026) The court allowed NY consumer protection claims against a kratom seller to proceed. Kratom is “a plant-derived substance that affects the human body in a manner … Continue reading
consumer false advertising plaintiffs can’t use surveys the way competitors can
Sinatro v. Barilla America, Inc., No. 22-cv-03460-ASK (N.D. Cal. Sept. 30, 2026) Deception of a substantial number of reasonable consumers, even well less than a majority, can be the basis of Lanham Act liability. But consumer protection cases have difficulty … Continue reading
dismissal of NYC’s consumer protection claims against fossil fuel companies affirmed
City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2026 WL 3023932, Appeal No. 6583, — N.Y.S.3d —- (App. Div. Oct. 8, 2026) False advertising claims against fossil fuel companies for contributing to climate change are hard to win. The City … Continue reading
candy buyers fail to allege difference between pumpkin & Jack-o’-lantern shape
Vidal v. Hershey Co., No. 24-60831-CIV-DAMIAN, 2026 WL 2730302 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2026) Reese’s Peanut Butter Pumpkins with carved face on package actual candy There’s a Reese’s Peanut Butter pumpkin. It was advertised with a Jack-o’-lantern package, but the … Continue reading
9th Circuit orders class decertified: common issues on materiality/damages insufficient without deception
Rusoff v. Happy Group, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 2387098, No. 24-7706 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2026) Court’s summary: This is a deceptive advertising class action concerning “pasture raised” labels on egg cartons. After excluding the opinion of plaintiffs’ … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
heavy weather for heavy metals in infant food
Choudhry v. Mead Johnson & Co., 2026 WL 2349932, No. 25-cv-09480 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2026) Plaintiffs alleged that various Enfamil infant formulas contained arsenic, cadmium, and lead, heavy metals that present significant health risks, particularly to young children, and … Continue reading
consumers face more skepticism than competitor in online gaming case
Mitchell v. Skillz Platform Inc., 2026 WL 2212876, No. 26-cv-00674-AMO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2026) Although competitors can aggregate harm to sue under the Lanham Act, consumers—the direct victims of false advertising—tend to have more trouble. Skillz just lost a … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
FDCA mostly preempts claims against ineffective decongestant
Yousefzadeh v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 2192415, Nos. 24-3296 (L), 25-119 (CON) (2d Cir. Jul. 30, 2026) Oral phenylephrine (oral PE), used in popular products as Nyquil Severe Cold & Flu, Advil Sinus Congestion … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment