Tag Archives: consumer protection

inability to rely on claims provides standing to seek injunctive relief in 9th Circuit

Posted on September 30, 2020 by

Milan v. Clif Bar & Co., 2020 WL 5760450, No. 18-cv-02354-JD (N.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2020) Plaintiffs brought the usual California claims against the “health and wellness message[s]” on defendant Clif Bar & Company’s “Kid Zbars” and “ ‘Classic’ Clif … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

restitution unavailable in fed ct when damages are adequate, no matter what Cal state cts say

Posted on September 24, 2020 by

Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp., 971 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 2020) In this amended opinion (original summarized here), the court elaborates on its reasoning that Sonner couldn’t abandon her damages claim on the eve of trial in this false advertising … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Second Circuit affirms flushable wipes damages class certification, disallows injunctive class

Posted on September 21, 2020 by

Kurtz v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, 818 Fed.Appx. 57, Nos. 17-1856-cv, 17-1858-cv (2d Cir. Jun. 26, 2020) This is a “flushable” wipes consumer protection class action. The district court previously certified damages and injunctive relief classes. On appeal, the Second Circuit … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

escalated materiality requirement precludes class certification

Posted on September 15, 2020 by

Oddo v. Arocaire Air Conditioning & Heating, 2020 WL 5267917, Nos. 15-cv-01985-CAS Ex, 18-cv-07030-CAS(Ex) (C.D. Cal. May 18, 2020) These are consolidated putative class actions alleging that defendants’ HVAC systems have faulty thermal expansion valves (TXVs). A TXV is “a … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

closing SeaWorld during pandemic didn’t make “unlimited” entry passes deceptive

Posted on September 14, 2020 by

Kouball v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., 2020 WL 5408918, No.: 20-cv-870-CAB-BGS (S.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2020) Kouball failed to state a claim under the usual California statutes and common law causes of action by alleging that SeaWorld deceptively failed … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sue Bee beats suit: “pure” survey not good enough to show deception over trace pesticide amounts

Posted on July 21, 2020 by

Tran v. Sioux Honey Assoc., 2020 WL 3989444, No. 17-cv-00110-JLS-SS (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2020)  Tran brought the usual California claims based on Sioux Honey products labeled as “Pure” and “100% Pure,” arguing that the products were mislabeled because they … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reasonable restaurant consumers wouldn’t think “krab mix” had real crab in it

Posted on April 29, 2020 by

Kang v. P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc., No. CV 19-02252 PA (SPx), 2020 WL 2027596 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2020) Kang alleged that P.F. Chang’s “employed a classic bait and switch tactic whereby it falsely labeled and advertised food products … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“no soy protein” claim for dog food plausibly indicates no soy

Posted on March 23, 2020 by

Rice-Sherman v. Big Heart Pet Brands, Inc., No. 19-cv-03613-WHO, 2020 WL 1245130 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2020) Plaintiffs alleged that Big Heart falsely markets its Grain Free Easy to Digest Salmon Sweet Potato & Pumpkin Recipe Dog Food as “Grain … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Statements in book promoting addiction treatment protected by Cal anti-SLAPP law

Posted on March 23, 2020 by

Selkirk v. Grasshopper House, LLC, 2020 WL 1241565, No. B294568 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2020) Defendants Grasshopper House and Passages Silver Strand “are luxury facilities that purport to treat drug and alcohol addiction.” Former patients sued them for allegedly … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

negative inference about other juices from “no sugar added” on D’s juice is implausible

Posted on March 12, 2020 by

Shaeffer v. Califia Farms, LLC, 44 Cal.App.5th 1125, No. B291085 (Feb. 6, 2020) Califia sells a “100% Tangerine Juice.” The front label includes “100% Tangerine Juice,” “No Sugar Added,” and “Never From Concentrate.” Shaeffer brought the usual California claims, alleging … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment