Tag Archives: consumer protection

Settlements allowing competitors to use term doesn’t insulate Clorox from its own possible deception

Gregorio v. Clorox Co., 2018 WL 732673, No. 17-cv-03824 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2018) Gregorio alleged that, to capitalize on consumer demand for “natural” home cleaning products, Clorox falsely advertised its “Green Works” cleaning products as “natural” or “naturally derived.” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Natural/organic cigarette claims might be deceptive (with bonus First Amendment talk)

In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mkting & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., 2017 WL 6550897, No. MD 16-2695 (D.N.M. Dec. 21, 2017) Lots of claims here against Natural American Cigarettes. Ultimately, the court allows consumer protection claims … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“prevailing price” consumer protection rule isn’t unconstitutionally vague

Haley v. Macy’s, Inc., 2017 WL 6539825, No. 15-cv-06033 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2017) Haley brought a typical putative class action, with the usual California claims, alleging that Macy’s mislabeled its merchandise with false or inflated “original” or “regular” prices … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Another consumer protection case survives despite invocation of In re GNC

Racies v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC, No. 15-cv-00292, 2017 WL 6418910  (N.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2017) The court granted Racies’ motion for certification of a California class against the makers of Prevagen, a supposed brain health supplement, covering the usual California … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Everything’s legal in Jersey: NJ SCt makes class certification harder in price disclosure case

Dugan v. TGI Fridays, Inc., 171 A.3d 620 (N.J. 2017) Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants failed to fairly disclose prices charged to customers for alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that one set of plaintiffs failed … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit rules inability to trust future representations provides standing for injunctive relief

Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 2017 WL 4700093, — F.3d –, No. 15-16173 (9th Cir. Oct. 20, 2017) Rejecting a number of district court decisions, the Ninth Circuit finds standing to seek injunctive relief under California consumer protection laws even when … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Consumer’s ability to trust future representations provides standing to seek injunctive relief

Delman v. J. Crew Group, Inc., 2017 WL 3048657, No. 16-9219 (C.D. Cal. May 15, 2017) This is another factory outlet false advertising case. The J. Crew Factory Website sells clothing and other items at what appears to be a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment