-
Recent Posts
- court finds “dupe” label probative of intent to confuse and likely confusion
- materiality divides false advertising and TM once again even with explicit falsity about official partnership
- Google’s alleged misrepresentations about sophisticated ad tech weren’t “consumer-oriented” under NY GBL
- consumer suit against kratom seller proceeds on failure to disclose theory
- Court sours on WSI’s claims against Quince
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: consumer protection
Google’s alleged misrepresentations about sophisticated ad tech weren’t “consumer-oriented” under NY GBL
In Re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litig., Nos. 21-md-3010 (PKC), 21-cv-3446 (PKC), 23-cv-5177 (PKC), 21-cv-7034 (PKC), 23-cv-1530 (PKC), 2026 WL 2942363 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2026) As the caption indicates, this is mostly an antitrust case, which means it’s amazing that … Continue reading
consumer suit against kratom seller proceeds on failure to disclose theory
Cheswick v. Mitra-9 Brands, LLC, 2026 WL 2949413, No. 1:25-CV-6795-LTS (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2026) The court allowed NY consumer protection claims against a kratom seller to proceed. Kratom is “a plant-derived substance that affects the human body in a manner … Continue reading
consumer false advertising plaintiffs can’t use surveys the way competitors can
Sinatro v. Barilla America, Inc., No. 22-cv-03460-ASK (N.D. Cal. Sept. 30, 2026) Deception of a substantial number of reasonable consumers, even well less than a majority, can be the basis of Lanham Act liability. But consumer protection cases have difficulty … Continue reading
dismissal of NYC’s consumer protection claims against fossil fuel companies affirmed
City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2026 WL 3023932, Appeal No. 6583, — N.Y.S.3d —- (App. Div. Oct. 8, 2026) False advertising claims against fossil fuel companies for contributing to climate change are hard to win. The City … Continue reading
candy buyers fail to allege difference between pumpkin & Jack-o’-lantern shape
Vidal v. Hershey Co., No. 24-60831-CIV-DAMIAN, 2026 WL 2730302 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2026) Reese’s Peanut Butter Pumpkins with carved face on package actual candy There’s a Reese’s Peanut Butter pumpkin. It was advertised with a Jack-o’-lantern package, but the … Continue reading
9th Circuit orders class decertified: common issues on materiality/damages insufficient without deception
Rusoff v. Happy Group, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 2387098, No. 24-7706 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2026) Court’s summary: This is a deceptive advertising class action concerning “pasture raised” labels on egg cartons. After excluding the opinion of plaintiffs’ … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
heavy weather for heavy metals in infant food
Choudhry v. Mead Johnson & Co., 2026 WL 2349932, No. 25-cv-09480 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2026) Plaintiffs alleged that various Enfamil infant formulas contained arsenic, cadmium, and lead, heavy metals that present significant health risks, particularly to young children, and … Continue reading
consumers face more skepticism than competitor in online gaming case
Mitchell v. Skillz Platform Inc., 2026 WL 2212876, No. 26-cv-00674-AMO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2026) Although competitors can aggregate harm to sue under the Lanham Act, consumers—the direct victims of false advertising—tend to have more trouble. Skillz just lost a … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
FDCA mostly preempts claims against ineffective decongestant
Yousefzadeh v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 2192415, Nos. 24-3296 (L), 25-119 (CON) (2d Cir. Jul. 30, 2026) Oral phenylephrine (oral PE), used in popular products as Nyquil Severe Cold & Flu, Advil Sinus Congestion … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
interactive website offering illegal-in-CT ghost guns wasn’t covered by CUTPA, but any sales were
Connecticut v. Indie Guns LLC, NO. (X06) UWY-CV23-6072307S, 2026 WL 2322641 (Ct. Super. Ct. Aug. 6, 2026) The state sued Indie Guns for selling illegal ghost guns into Connecticut. Indie Guns defaulted, but the court only granted partial default judgment—merely … Continue reading