-
Recent Posts
- State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar
- compounding pharmacies lose a round with Lilly on personalized medicine and GLP-1 comparison claims
- Bayer can’t enjoin J&J’s cancer superiority claims by showing methodological disputes
- “higher standard of safety” is puffery even as to child car seats
- phthalates could be “ingredient” for purposes of falsifying “only natural ingredients”
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: consumer protection
“higher standard of safety” is puffery even as to child car seats
ElSayed v. Columbus Trading Partners USA Inc., No. 25-cv-01347 (FB) (TAM), 2026 WL 1042209 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2026) ElSayed alleged that CTP’s infant car seat were faulty and defective in violation of NY consumer protection law. The court dismissed the … Continue reading
phthalates could be “ingredient” for purposes of falsifying “only natural ingredients”
Wysocki v. Chobani, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 25-cv-00907-JES-VET, 2026 WL 926713 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2026) Wysocki alleged that Chobani’s Greek Yogurt had dangerous phthalates in it. Phthalates are “a group of chemicals [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) … Continue reading
Brita’s clearly qualified filtration claims couldn’t mislead reasonable consumers as to lack of qualification
Brown v. Brita Products Company, — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 1028347 No. 24-6678 (9th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) Unlike 800-thread count sheets (see previous post), a reasonable consumer would not expect a fifteen-dollar water filter to “remove or reduce to … Continue reading
an impossible claim is literally false and actionable if believing it is reasonable
Panelli v. Target Corp., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 1042441, No. 24-6640 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026) Something that I don’t yet have a full handle on is happening in 9th Circuit consumer protection cases around literal falsity v. ambiguity. … Continue reading
FTC mostly succeeds in avoiding dismissal of claims against Uber; states must replead
Federal Trade Comm’n v. Uber Technol., Inc., 2026 WL 976077, No. 25-cv-03477-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2026) Since November 2021, Uber has offered a subscription plan called Uber One, typically $9.99 a month or $96 annually with automatic charging and … Continue reading
Reading list: The Vanishing Enforcer: Consumer Protection in an Era of Dual Retrenchment
Alisher Juzgenbayev, The Vanishing Enforcer: Consumer Protection in an Era of Dual Retrenchment, 120 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1449 (2026). Abstract Recent developments, including reductions in the federal workforce, effective suspension of certain enforcement activities, and attempted centralization of independent … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, ftc, reading list
Leave a comment
two cases reach opposite results over whether “health” claims are misleading if products are lead-contaminated
Lopez v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., 2026 WL 788492, No. 24-cv-03573-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026) Lopez alleged that Mead infant formulas’ packaging contains deceptive statements that imply that they are generally nutritious and have “no detrimental, harmful, or genetically … Continue reading
“carbon neutral” not plausibly misleading where D bought offsets from 3d-party certifiers, despite methodological disputes
Bell v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., 2026 WL 915295, No. 25-cv-04521-TLT (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2026) Bell brought the usual California claims based on RJR’s alleged misrepresentation of its products’ carbon neutrality. The court dismissed the complaint. RJR labeled its … Continue reading
Washington Supreme Court rejects private standing for discount misrepresentations
Montes v. Sparc Group LLC, 2026 WL 900481, No. 104162-4, — P.3d —-, 2026 WL 900481 (Wash. Apr. 2, 2026) Interpreting the Washington Consumer Protection Act, the state supreme court held, over a dissent, that buying products that are falsely … Continue reading
“shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
DeMarco v. DNVB, Inc. (Thursday Boot Co.), No. 25-CV-3076 (GHW) (RFT), 2025 WL 4378637 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2025) (R&R) Thursday Boot sells shoes, apparel, handbags, and accessories on its website, which offers “free shipping and returns in the U. S.” … Continue reading