Tag Archives: tortious interference

Monster Energy can’t show falsity, can show tortious interference (but not irreparable injury)

Monster Energy Co. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2019 WL 3099711, No. EDCV 18-1882 JGB (SHKx) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2019) The court denied a preliminary injunction on Monster’s claim that Vital falsely advertised its “Super Creatine” as “creatine,” because there … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

lack of specifics, even with certification involved, dooms falsity claim

Hydro-Blok USA LLC v. Wedi Corp., 2019 WL 2515318, No. C15-671 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jun. 18, 2019) Wedi and Hydro-Blok compete in the market for construction materials and sealants for use in bathroom systems, including showers. Wedi accused Hydro-Blok of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

variety in superiority claims can add up to disparagement

Deerpoint Group, Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLC, 2019 WL 2513756, No. 18-CV-0536 AWI BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2019) Deerpoint sued Agrigenix for violating the Lanham Act and California’s UCL via false advertising, violating California and federal trade secret law, and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

photo of competitor’s product not false where it’s indistinguishable; also some design patent functionality

Tactical Medical Solutions, Inc. v. KARL 2019 WL 2435859, No. 14 C 06035 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 11, 2019) TMS sued Karl and his sole proprietorship, EMI, for infringement of TMS’s design and utility patents by selling a “knockoff” version of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

preyed on twice over: timeshare and timeshare exit lawyer squabble with consumers as collateral damage

Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. Sussman, No. 6:17-cv-1467-Orl-37DCI (M.D. Fla. May 31, 2019) OK, this fact shocked me: about 35% of Westgate’s timeshare buyers default some time during their loan periods, according to the decision here in this battle in the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Timeshare wars: no Lanham Act standing for property owner

Wyndham Vacation Ownership v. Reed Hein & Assoc., LLC, 2019 WL 2232241, No. 18-cv-02171-GAP-DCI (M.D. Fla. May 23, 2019) Somebody seriously needs to write a story about the litigation war going on between timeshare companies and firms that sue timeshare … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

law firm alleging clients lost to competitor satisfies Lexmark, in part

Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc., No. 17-1156-EFM-JPO, 2019 WL 2073872 (D. Kan. May 10, 2019) Brave, a personal injury firm, sued various parties for violating the Lanham Act and Kansas state law.   It alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment