-
Recent Posts
- it’s hard to get rid of a foreign TM owner’s complaint at the motion to dismiss stage despite territoriality
- dct strikes down California’s new recyclability law on vagueness/1A grounds
- look, there’s a lawsuit: bad claim against comedian leads to anti-SLAPP award
- 5th Circuit puts its own spin on the server test
- weak infringement case + bad litigation conduct = fee shift for anticompetitive suit over descriptive term
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: tortious interference
republishing scientific study to prospective customers isn’t protected opinion
Advance Dx, Inc. v. YourBio Health, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 4393314, No. 24-10595-WGY (D. Mass. Oct. 3, 2024) Advance sued YourBio, which competes in the market for at-home medical device testing patients’ level of anti-Mullerian hormone, for false … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, disparagement, false advertising, tortious interference
Leave a comment
reseller’s unsuccessful challenge to takedown notices leads to more successful infringement counterclaim
CDC Newburgh Inc. v. STM Bags, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 6066136, 22-cv-1597 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2023) CDC sued STM, alleging violations of New York state and federal law arising from STM’s involvement in the removal of ten … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, false advertising, tortious interference, trademark
Leave a comment
accusing someone of patent infringement can be actionable disparagement if you know the patent’s invalid
Cap Export, LLC v. Zinus, Inc., 2023 WL 6381821, No. 2:21-cv-07148-JWH-MRWx (C.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2023) Cap Export alleged that Zinus fraudulently obtained a patent after Zinus used the public domain bed-in-a-box sets of a non-party as the basis for … Continue reading
state consumer protection law gives competitor plaintiff more leeway than Lanham Act, court holds
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Company, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4463246, No. 2:17-cv-00702-RJS-DAO (D. Utah Jul. 11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, false advertising, tortious interference, trademark
Leave a comment
accusing a home inspectors’ group of link with NAMBLA isn’t believable enough for defamation
Examination Board of Professional Home Inspectors v. International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, 2021 WL 492482, No 18-cv-01559-RBJ (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2021) Although an individual’s comments linking his rival to NAMBLA and Jeffrey Dahmer were non-actionable non-facts, statements arguably … Continue reading
independent contractors as agents in creating fake reviews
RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc., 2021 WL 2476879, No. 19-cv-02626-NC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2021) The parties are cloud-based communications companies. RingCentral offers voice, virtual private branch exchange, audio and video conferencing, messaging, contact center collaboration, SMS, online meetings, contact … Continue reading
tortious interference claim from false advertising survives, but why bother?
Logistick, Inc. v. AB Airbags, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 2433944, No. 3:21-cv-00151-BEN-MDD (S.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021) Logistick sells disposable load bars which are used to secure cargo freight during transport. AB allegedly began advertising for a similar … Continue reading
pharmaceutical equivalence isn’t therapeutic equivalence/FDA approval
Concordia Pharmaceuticals Inc., S.À.R.L. v. Winder Laboratories, LLC, 2021 WL 3573118, No. 16-cv-00004-RWS (N.D. Ga. Feb. 17, 2021) Concordia makes DONNATAL, a combination of phenobarbital and belladonna alkaloids (PBA) used to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and acute enterocolitis. Winder … Continue reading
Even a default can’t make false claims made to Amazon violate the Lanham Act
Wilco Trading LLC v. Shabat, 2021 WL 1146634, No. 8:20-cv-579-TPB-JSS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2021) (R&R) Wilco is an online reseller, primarily on Amazon. It allegedly sold authentic beauty products made or branded by defendant EL Sales, which nonetheless filed … Continue reading