Tag Archives: conferences

Posted on April 16, 2026 by rtushnet

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Panel 2: The Role of the Author and the Acquisition and Duration of Their Rights Molly Van Houweling, UC Berkeley Law (Moderator) Tyler Ochoa, Santa … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act: Origins of the Copyright Act

Posted on April 16, 2026 by rtushnet

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act [apologies—seriously delayed flight means my notetaking will be bad.] Panel 1: Origins of the 1976 Copyright Act Peter Menell, UC Berkeley Law (Speaker and Moderator): … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Commemorating 50 Years of the Copyright Act, part 3

Posted on April 4, 2026 by rtushnet

STLR Panel 2: Litigating Fair Use in Copyright Zahr Said: Substantial similarity is confused. Sedlik is a good example. Laudable for concurrences to recognize need for reform in this crummy, confusing test, but that’s not reflected in the case itself. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Commemorating 50 Years of the Copyright Act, part 2

Posted on April 3, 2026 by rtushnet

The 1976 Copyright Act: Mostly Evolutionary, Not Revolutionary Tyler Ochoa 1790 Act adopted the Statute of Anne—not radical even though it was the first for the US. Similar here—major changes, but not radical. Expanded subject matter; protection on creation/fixation instead … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Commemorating 50 Years of the 1976 Copyright Act, Stanford Law School

Posted on April 3, 2026 by rtushnet

The Copyright Act at 50: Evolution and Impact Shira Perlmutter Copyright Act took a long time, with input from lots of interest groups and attention to detail—hundreds of contending and overlapping interests were involved. Hard to imagine this process today. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II

Posted on February 28, 2026 by rtushnet

A Pantone Prerogative: Defining the Privilege to Standardize Color (Felicia Caponigri) Color standards have been around for a long time. Pantone developed standards and uses its system to promote the colors; registration for the matching system and the color chip. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine

Posted on February 28, 2026 by rtushnet

 The Arbitrary Myth (Dustin Marlan) Connecting the Abercrombie critique literature w/some of the critical/cultural appropriation theory. Judge Friendly says: it need hardly be added that fanciful and arbitrary terms enjoy the protection accorded to suggestive terms. Catachresis: strained metaphor—arbitrary marks … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies

Posted on February 27, 2026 by rtushnet

The European Accent of U.S. Digital Platform Speech (Brian Downing) We are often told that self-governance by corporate platforms is better than government control, but his experience was that freedom of action wasn’t free. US gov’t defers to platforms, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies

Posted on February 27, 2026 by rtushnet

A Digital Right of Publicity for the AI World (Emma Perot) Prehistory: ROP covers lookalikes, soundalikes, video game avatars (at least for realism). Persona as training data. Theories of personality: users informed about use; many social media companies do not … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP Panel 2: Copyright and Culture

Posted on February 27, 2026 by rtushnet

  Copyright’s Invisible Hand: Subsidizing America’s Cultural Institutions (Guy Rub) © sometimes requires payment from more intensive users, sometimes not. Exclusive rights: unbundling—buy a book to read v. buy a book to adapt to movie. Fair use is sometimes bundling: … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment