Tag Archives: conferences

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 4: Industry Perspectives

Posted on April 8, 2023 by rtushnet

Moderator: Daphne Keller, Stanford Cyber Policy Center    DSA represents a shift to operational mandates compared to DMCA, Art. 17—thoughts? Sabrina Perelman, Pinterest: Important to remember what DSA is and isn’t. We’ve preserved the safe harbor, prohibition against general monitoring. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 3: Intended and Unintended Consequences of the DSA

Posted on April 7, 2023 by rtushnet

 Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights        João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights, Keynote on emerging tech

Posted on April 7, 2023 by rtushnet

Shira Perlmutter AI detection and AI generation of content: CO has role to play in applications for registration and as advisors to Congress/exec branch on © law and policy. Use of tech measures to detect works online: we published a … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 2: Will the DSA Achieve a “Brussels Effect”?

Posted on April 7, 2023 by rtushnet

 Moderator: Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Copyright Law and/or/vs. a ‘Brussels Effect’ for the Digital Services Act Jennifer Urban, Berkeley Law School The Brussels Effect claim is descriptive, not predictive—can it apply to the DSA? Criteria favoring a Brussels Effect … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Keynote and copyright interactions

Posted on April 7, 2023 by rtushnet

Opening Keynote by Irene Roche-Laguna of the European Commission’s DGCONNECT group on origins and aspirations for the DSA People thought it couldn’t be done; didn’t know whether it would be a directive or a regulation. But took only 6 months … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA—A Transatlantic Dialogue on Online Platform Liability and Copyright Law

Posted on April 7, 2023 by rtushnet

Tutorial “The EU Digital Services Act – Overview and Central Features” General DSA Architecture and Approach      Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Formally, the safe harbor system is still in place for mere conduit, caching and hosting services for third-party information … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Protecting Creativity with a Bottle of Jack on the Floribama Shore (and tiny JDI oral argument observations)

Posted on March 24, 2023 by rtushnet

Media Law Resource Center conference, Southwestern Law School Kevin Vick, Jassy Vick Carolan LLP (Moderator) Just a few panel notes since I’m not going to recap Rogers or MFGB v. Viacom. Evynne Grover, Vice President, Media Liability Claims Practice Leader, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Panel on Jack Daniels argument at AU-WCL, March 22

Posted on March 20, 2023 by rtushnet

 IP at the Supreme Court Series: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC March 22 | 5:00 – 6:30pm EDT | Hybrid | NT01 | Reception to FollowRegistration Required Moderated by Professor Christine Farley American University Washington College of Law regularly … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Fourteenth Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable, part 3 (Evidence)

Posted on February 25, 2023 by rtushnet

Changes in Trademark Law and Evidentiary Rules Introduction:   Jake Linford Before courts admitted surveys routinely, they were concerned about hearsay. Sometimes rejecting surveys seems like judicial notice—“cola” as generic; the court doesn’t want to hear contrary survey evidence. Some objections … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Fourteenth Trademark Scholars Roundtable, part 2

Posted on February 25, 2023 by rtushnet

 Session 2:        Responding to Anachronisms Introduction:   Mike Grynberg VIP may tell us a lot about what the potentials are. Incrementalism: read Lanham Act along with other things like its common law foundations and First Amendment principles—not empty formalism; recognize normative … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment