Tag Archives: conferences

Panel 6: Unanticipated Consequences of New Technologies and Practices

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Jennifer Urban, UC Berkeley Law (Speaker and Moderator) Daniel Gervais, Vanderbilt Law: Copyright act as undergirding licensing architectures for AI. © rights are inert without … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Panel 5: Copyrightable Subject Matter and the Special Problem of Software

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Pamela Samuelson, UC Berkeley Law (Moderator and Speaker): discusses history (in which she was intimately involved as an intellectual powerhouse). From uncertainty over whether software … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Copyright Act Panel 4: The Shifting Line Between Federal and State Protection

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976  R. Anthony Reese, UCI School of Law Fundamental change: eliminating common-law copyright for unpublished works and unifying the regime at creation. Contemporaries like Ralph Sharp Brown saw … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Panel 6: Unanticipated Consequences of New Technologies and Practices

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Jennifer Urban, UC Berkeley Law (Speaker and Moderator) Daniel Gervais, Vanderbilt Law: Copyright act as undergirding licensing architectures for AI. © rights are inert without … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Panel 5: Copyrightable Subject Matter and the Special Problem of Software

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Pamela Samuelson, UC Berkeley Law (Moderator and Speaker): discusses history (in which she was intimately involved as an intellectual powerhouse). From uncertainty over whether software … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Copyright Act Panel 4: The Shifting Line Between Federal and State Protection

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976  R. Anthony Reese, UCI School of Law Fundamental change: eliminating common-law copyright for unpublished works and unifying the regime at creation. Contemporaries like Ralph Sharp Brown saw … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Panel 3: The Scope of Exclusive Rights and Modes of Enforcement

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Erik Stallman, UC Berkeley Law (Moderator) Christopher Sprigman, NYU Law: Restatement of ©: assumes perspective of common law court, attentive to and respectful of precedent … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act Panel 2: The Role of the Author and the Acquisition and Duration of Their Rights Molly Van Houweling, UC Berkeley Law (Moderator) Tyler Ochoa, Santa … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act: Origins of the Copyright Act

29th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Spring Symposium: Origins, Evolution, and Possible Futures of the 1976 Copyright Act [apologies—seriously delayed flight means my notetaking will be bad.] Panel 1: Origins of the 1976 Copyright Act Peter Menell, UC Berkeley Law (Speaker and Moderator): … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Commemorating 50 Years of the Copyright Act, part 3

STLR Panel 2: Litigating Fair Use in Copyright Zahr Said: Substantial similarity is confused. Sedlik is a good example. Laudable for concurrences to recognize need for reform in this crummy, confusing test, but that’s not reflected in the case itself. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment