Tag Archives: commercial speech

10th Circuit finds that disparagement by pet food company was commercial speech though affiliated vets’/nonprofits’ speech wasn’t

KetoNatural Pet Foods, Inc. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc., No. 24-3185 (10th Cir. Jul. 14, 2026) The court of appeals affirms in part and reverses in part the district court opinion dismissing Lanham Act claims against Hill’s and other defendants. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar

Really wanted a Sweeney Todd reference here but couldn’t figure it out. Osteria Segreto, LLC v. Hilgers, No. 8:26-cv-00065-BCB-MDN (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2026) Osteria Segreto, formerly “an Italian speakeasy” in a space that had once been a hair salon, restyled … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar

Really wanted a Sweeney Todd reference here but couldn’t figure it out. Osteria Segreto, LLC v. Hilgers, No. 8:26-cv-00065-BCB-MDN (D. Neb. Apr. 20, 2026) Osteria Segreto, formerly “an Italian speakeasy” in a space that had once been a hair salon, restyled … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

abortion clinic can proceed with false advertising claims against for-profit ad agency and (in part) the anti-abortion “center” it touted

Four Women Health Servs., LLC v. Abundant Hope Pregnancy Resource Center, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-12283-JEK, 2026 WL 836424 (D. Mass. Mar. 26, 2026) Four Women is a licensed healthcare clinic that provides reproductive healthcare, including abortion care, to its patients. Abundant … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

court enjoins lawyer from using exaggerated/distorted animation of misfiring gun in advertising

Sig Sauer, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Esq., LLC, No. 3:22-cv-00885 (VAB), 2026 WL 867181 (D. Conn. Mar. 20, 2026) Bagnell, a lawyer, commissioned a graphics company to create an animation purporting to show how a P320 pistol could misfire … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

False endorsement claim can proceed against gov’t issued license plates and gov’t facility named for Roberto Clemente

Clemente Properties, Inc. v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 125574, No. 23-1922 (1st Cir. Jan. 16, 2026) The representatives of the family of a famous deceased Puerto Rico baseball player, Roberto Clemente, sued the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

thorough opinion allows CT’s greenwashing claims against Exxon to proceed

State v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2025 WL 3459468, No. HHDCV206132568S (Conn. Super. Ct. Nov. 26, 2025) The court allows greenwashing claims against Exxon to proceed under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). The state alleged a decades-long “systematic campaign … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“abortion pill reversal” proponents engaged in noncommercial speech, 2d Circuit agrees for PI purposes

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. James, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 3439256, No. 24-2481-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 1, 2025) Unlike the similar California proceeding, the district court in NY granted a preliminary injunction against enforcement of consumer … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

California’s limits on use of “doctor” in healthcare settings are constitutional regulations of commercial speech

Palmer v. Bonta, 2025 WL 2882948, No. EDCV 23-1047 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that California Business and Professions Code § 2054(a), on its face and as enforced, violates the First Amendment because it provides, in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“abortion reversal” promoter engaged in inherently and potentially misleading commercial speech, court rules

Culture of Life Family Services, Inc. v. Bonta, 2025 WL 1677783, No. 3:24-cv-01338-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2025) In two opinions on the same day, the court didn’t give much comfort to an “abortion reversal” provider. COLFS sought to enjoin … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment