-
Recent Posts
- “higher standard of safety” is puffery even as to child car seats
- phthalates could be “ingredient” for purposes of falsifying “only natural ingredients”
- Brita’s clearly qualified filtration claims couldn’t mislead reasonable consumers as to lack of qualification
- an impossible claim is literally false and actionable if believing it is reasonable
- Panel 6: Unanticipated Consequences of New Technologies and Practices
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: commercial speech
coordinated campaign to disparage grain-free & other pet food not actionable under Lanham Act
Ketonatural Pet Foods, Inc. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc., 2024 WL 4679219, No. 24-2046-KHV (D. Kan. Nov. 4, 2024) Ketonatural is a start-up that sells grain-free pet food, treats, and supplements. Hill’s is a large pet food company that makes … Continue reading
lawsuit against plaintiffs’ expert witness fails on First Amendment grounds
LTL Mgmt. LLC v. Moline, 2024 WL 3219683, No. 23-02990 (GC) (JTQ) (D.N.J. Jun. 28, 2024) Not currently in bankruptcy, LTL—J&J’s solution to its talc woes—decided to sue a critic for her scientific conclusions about talc risks. The court dismisses … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, defamation, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
Is a free trial version “commercial speech”?
Enigma Software Gp. USA LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc., 2024 WL 2883671, No. 17-cv-02915-EJD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024) This is the latest decision in long-running litigation over Malwarebytes’ characterization of Enigma’s competing cybersecurity and anti-malware software as “malicious,” a “threat,” … Continue reading
5th Circuit allows image-based tobacco warnings in barest nod to consistency on compelled commercial speech
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Food & Drug Admin., 2024 WL 1208111, — F.4th —-, No. 23-40076 (5th Cir. Mar. 21, 2024) The sudden shift in the political valence of the commercial speech doctrine strikes again! The Fifth Circuit … Continue reading
new article w/Mark Lemley: First Amendment Neglect in SCOTUS IP Cases
First Amendment Neglect in Supreme Court Intellectual Property Cases Mark A. Lemley & Rebecca Tushnet (forthcoming, Supreme Court Review) Abstract The Supreme Court decided two cases of central importance to free speech during the 2022 term – in both cases … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, copyright, first amendment, my writings, trademark
Leave a comment
Earnings calls, recall notices not “commercial advertising or promotion,” but could be “of and concerning” largest market player
In re SoClean, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. Litig., 2023 WL 8006602, MDL No. 3021, No. 22-542 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 17, 2023) Because this is MDL with lots of claims, the facts are a bit complicated. SoClean is … Continue reading
Artistic Expression or Crass Commercialism? Drawing the lines in Right of Publicity, Lanham Act, and Commercial Speech Cases
PLI Media Law conference RT: There’s been a rapid and somewhat disorienting shift from a seemingly ever-growing First Amendment freedom of speech to a seeming indifference to speech and press based claims (as contrasted to religious freedom claims) in many … Continue reading
Covid-19 Act gives government more options in proceeding against supplement seller
U.S. v. Nepute, 2023 WL 4623089, No. 4:21-CV-437 RLW (E.D. Mo. Jul. 19, 2023) The US sued Nepute (a chiropractor) and Quickwork (a company of which he is a member/co-manager). for deceptive advertising of dietary supplements in violation of the … Continue reading
ESG statements are commercial speech excluded from California’s anti-SLAPP law
Hicks v. Grimmway Enters., Inc., 2023 WL 3829689, No. 22-CV-2038 JLS (DDL) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023) Hicks alleged that defendant, a California agricultural corporation, misrepresented the environmental impact of its farming practices through its advertising and “Inaugural Report on … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged california, commercial speech, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
fake meat law reinstated on appeal: intentionally misleading commercial speech gets no protection
Turtle Island Foods, S.P.C. v. Strain, No. 22-30236 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Reversing the district court, the court of appeals found that Tofurkey’s facial challenge to a Louisiana anti-fake meat law failed because the law plausibly could be read … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment