Tag Archives: surveys

compounding pharmacy must face drugmaker’s Lanham Act claims based on false 503B compliance statements

Pacira BioSciences, Inc. v. Nephron Sterile Compounding Center, LLC, No. 3:23-cv-05552-CMC, 2026 WL 2267750 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2026) Pacira sells an FDA-approved pain management drug called EXPAREL. Nephron allegedly made various false and misleading statements about two of Nephron’s competing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout Session 3 Trademark Confusion & Consumer Perception

Trademark Confusion as a Matter of Law, Andrew Michaels Is infringement a proposition about the world, or about the law? Fact: an empirical predictive question about the world. Law: a normative judgment about whether there should be legal responsibility—is the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Under Armour defeats Lanham Act claim, must continue to fight tortious interference

Multiple Energy Technol., LLC v. Under Armour, Inc., 2026 WL 2016679, 2:20-CV-664 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 13, 2026) Bioceramic powder is “a substance that is integrated into clothing, and, when worn, allegedly improves sleep and muscle recovery.” Plaintiff MET made a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

breast pump rules: Think Green’s trade dress claims against Medela proceed to trial

Think Green Ltd. v. Medela AG, 2025 WL 1826137, No. 21 CV 5445 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 2, 2025) Think Green sued Medela for infringing its trade dress in its breast pump, as well as false advertising claims that were quickly … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ambiguity in consumer class actions v. the Lanham Act: convergence or divergence?

Slaten v. Christian Dior Perfumes, LLC, 2025 WL 1840026, No. 23-cv-00409-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2025) The concept of ambiguity is now on a path to become as entrenched in consumer protection cases as in Lanham Act cases. My thinking … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Southern discomfort: class certified over malt beverage dressed like Southern Comfort whiskey

Andrews v. Sazerac Co., 2025 WL 1808797, No. 23-cv-1060 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that Sazerac deceived consumers by selling a malt beverage that looks like Southern Comfort whiskey but in fact contains only “whiskey flavor.” The court … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Scotts loses trade dress claim over green & gold for Miracle-Gro

Scotts Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 2025 WL 1779167, No. 2:24-cv-4199 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 27, 2025) A different Scotts trade dress claim than the one I blogged last year. While it’s hard to get rid of trademark claims on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

materiality surveys may not need controls

In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., No. 14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

annoyingly redacted opinion finds Block falsely advertised versus TurboTax

Intuit Inc. v. HRB Tax Gp., Inc., 2024 WL 5320392, No. 5:24-cv-00253-BLF (N.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2024) Intuit, which makes TurboTax and has had some advertising troubles of its own (hey, check out the IRS Free File program, for taxpayers … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

materiality survey is in–even with 20 industry employees as respondents

Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Under Armour, INC., 2025 WL 82336, No. 2:20-CV-664-NR (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2025) MET sued Under Armour for multiple things, including false advertising, and here MET sought to exclude the testimony of Under Armour’s consumer … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment