-
Recent Posts
- The fact/opinion divide: threat or menace? 9th Cir revives suit against Malwarebytes
- Are surcharge disclosures fair?
- Mexican flag and “taste of Mexico” not enough to deceive reasonable consumers about non-Mexican origin, 2d Cir rules
- court: there’s no right to jury trial when seeking only injunction/disgorgement in false advertising case
- alleged price bait-and-switch with large “processing fee” suffices to plead Lanham Act false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: January 2014
changing goodwill signalled by mark isn’t infringement
Purdum v. Wolfe, No. C–13–04816, 2014 WL 171546 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2014) Kickstarter infringement dispute, which as a side note raises interesting questions of responsibility for third-party structuring of tools. Plaintiffs Barrett Purdum, Michael Armenta, and Michael Maher are … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
No records, no class action against Chipotle
Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 12-cv-05543 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2013) The court rejected a proposed class action based on Chipotle’s alleged practice of serving conventionally raised meats on occasions when “naturally raised” meats were not available, though it … Continue reading
falsely claiming continued TM ownership leads to liability
C=HOLDINGS B.V. v. Asiarim Corp., 2013 WL 6987165, No. 12 Civ. 928 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2013) C= sued Asiarim for infringement of Commodore trademarks (“a brand long associated with the 8–bit gaming computer popular in the early 1980s”) and related … Continue reading
Product placement labeled news attracts NAD’s condemnation
American Media, Inc. (Shape Water Boosters), NAD Case #5665 (Dec. 18, 2013) NAD brought this case itself. NYT article on the case, of note given the NYT’s own foray into “native advertising.” An article in Shape magazine, and on its … Continue reading
Reading list: Fagundes on market harm in the fair use test
David Fagundes, Market Harm, Market Help, and Fair Use (forthcoming 2014) Judges, commentators, and practitioners alike agree that the final factor of copyright’s four-part statutory fair use defense to copyright infringement requires judges to consider “market harm.” That is, all … Continue reading
there’s no transformation but what we make for ourselves
Transformative work of the month, at least! Terminator 2, retold using only lines from Shakespeare. Via FC. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
World Without Privacy Wrapup
Overview and Commentary Ronald Krotoszynski, John S. Stone Chairholder of Law, The University of Alabama Moderator: Montré Carodine, Associate Professor of Law, The University of Alabama Krotoszynski: potential virtues of a comparative law perspective. All of the papers reflect … Continue reading
World Without Privacy 4
Session IV: Enough About Me: Why Privacy is About Power, Not Consent or Harm Lisa M. Austin, Associate Professor, University of Toronto Faculty of Law Consent is often seen as the heart and soul of models of privacy protection. These … Continue reading
World Without Privacy 3
Session III: Four Privacy Myths Neil Richards, Professor of Law, Washington University (1) Privacy is dead. 1970: Newsweek cover story: Is privacy dead? People have been declaring privacy dead for a while. Privacy law is booming, as is debate on … Continue reading
OTW participates in Copyright Week
Here we are talking about fair use! http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss