-
Recent Posts
- Fairlife brand name plausibly misleading where cows allegedly lived abuse-filled lives of suffering
- disgorgement can’t be a lottery windfall–even when D was engaged in illegal gambling
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: January 2014
keyword purchase supports unfair competition verdict
Chow v. Chak Yam Chau, — Fed.Appx. —-, 2014 WL 92094, No. 12–15994 (11th Cir. Jan. 10, 2014) Michael Chow credits himself with introducing “high-end Chinese cuisine in a fine dining setting to the west” through the “Mr Chow” restaurants … Continue reading
time to shell out for an IP lawyer
You can’t say Pom’s owners aren’t willing to pick a fight (or a fruit or nut). Also via Zach Schrag. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Hedging and bullying in trademark
Chicago State University attempts to intimidate a faculty blog into not identifying itself properly, using trademark law as its bullying tool/justification. This takes a turn for the silly as the university now objects to a picture of CSU hedges, trimmed … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Cert granted in Pom Wonderful v. Coca-Cola
Orders list here. There were also some grants relating to some other minor IP issues. Pom’s petition, with QP: “Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a private party cannot bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a product … Continue reading
Trademark strategy question of the day
MLA Subconference is “an independent and evolving group of graduate students in the humanities who are interested in creating a new kind of conference environment, in order to propose alternative professional, social, and political possibilities for ourselves and our peers.” … Continue reading
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Inability to determine who bought what dooms class certification
Astiana v. Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, Inc., 2014 WL 60097, No. C 10-4387 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2014) The court denied certification to a proposed class who bought ice cream from Ben & Jerry’s that contained alkalized cocoa and were … Continue reading
New piece: Henry Jenkins and fair use
I wrote a short piece for a festschrift on Henry Jenkins’ Textual Poachers. I think it might have my best title since Rules of Engagement. “I’m a Lawyer, Not an Ethnographer, Jim”: Textual Poachers and Fair Use. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Olympic rectangles?
Picture from nearby skating rink So, does the configuration of shirts sufficiently replicate the 5-ring symbol to trigger the protections found in US law? http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Appropriation art and sf book covers
How a Science Fiction Book Cover Became a $5.7 Million Painting: Appropriation art that relies on expanding size, not shrinking compared to the original, for the claim of transformativeness. E.g., from a program: “[The paintings] are unusual for Brown in … Continue reading
Oracle suit against third party claiming to provide lawful software updates proceeds
Oracle America, Inc. v. TERiX Computer Company, Inc., No. 13-cv-03385, 2014 WL 31344 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2014) Oracle sells hardware, software, and support and consulting services to maintain those. But people also use third-party vendors for support, and here … Continue reading