Monthly Archives: January 2014

"Natural" is too vague to be false advertising

Balser v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. CV 13–05604, 2013 WL 6673617 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)   Plaintiffs sued Hain for using “natural” and “100% vegetarian” on over 30 of its cosmetics, and the court dismissed the complaint.  Fraud … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Claims relating to organic content completely preempted

Quesada v. Herb Thyme Farms, Inc., — Cal. Rptr. 3d —-, No. B239602, 2013 WL 6730808 (Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013) The court found that the federal Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 preempts state consumer lawsuits alleging violations of … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

Sleep Number no more: false advertising but not TM claims get TRO

Select Comfort Corp. v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc.,  No. 13–2451, 2013 WL 6767821 (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2013) Select Comfort, which sells Sleep Number/Select Comfort mattresses, sought a TRO against Mattress Firm (one of the defendants), a mattress retailer that … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment