Monthly Archives: February 2014

WIPIP: IP theory

Session 4: IP Theory, Parlor B Annemarie Bridy, Internet Payment Blockades Wikileaks: State Department publicly accused Wikileaks of violating US law; payment systems were suspended—PayPal, Visa, Mastercard.  Wikileaks ran through cash reserves in less than a year and suspended publication.  … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, design patent, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, right of publicity, trademark | Leave a comment

WIPIP: copyright doctrine

Session 3: Copyright Doctrine Patrick Goold , UC Berkeley School of Law (fellow) Is Liability for Copyright Infringement Strict? Strict liability is conduct plus outcome.  Fault-based is conduct, outcome, and fault. Fault can be based on the standard of conduct … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Transformative work of the day?

Jane Perkins makes collage art from found objects.  How should we think about the copyright, TM, and right of publicity implications of these: See more at these links and the artist’s site, where a print of the latter is available. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, right of publicity, trademark | Leave a comment

The ecstasy of influence

The Way We Live Now by David Brooks, by Jody Rosen.  Violation of the moral right of attribution?  Does this flunk Rogers v. Grimaldi?  Is it protected against trademark claims anyway?  Transformative work of the day? (Maybe not. I’ve got another … Continue reading

Posted in attribution, copying, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

WIPIP: First Amendment

Session 2: First Amendment T.J. Chiang, George Mason University Patents and the First Amendment Patents on methods of communication: why isn’t this a 1A problem?  Similar to ©: can prevent other people from saying what they want to say, how … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dilution, first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, trademark | Leave a comment

WIPIP: copyright procedure

Sat. Session 1: Copyright Procedure Julie Cromer Young, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Rethinking Copyright Pleadings Historically low pleading standards changed by Twiqbal.  Conclusory allegations can be ignored, then remaining judged for plausibility; court can use common sense to see … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

WIPIP part 2, TM doctrine (and false advertising)

Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of Law Sleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark Convention TTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v.  Philip Morris—cancelled an incontestable mark on the ground that it violated the Pan-American Convention, which is self-executing. That … Continue reading

Posted in conferences, copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Works in Progress in IP, part 1

WIPIP Session 1: Copyright Theory, Parlor C Chris Buccafusco & David Fagundes, The Moral Foundations of Copyright (Fagundes presenting) Copyright is deeply moral; best explained by moral foundations theory; these are descriptive claims. Normative claims: how we talk about copyright/how … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, music | Leave a comment

oral copyright license equals uncertainty in business dispute

Yong Ki Hong v. KBS America, Inc., 951 F. Supp. 2d 402 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) Plaintiffs, who operated a video rental store catering to customers seeking Korean videotapes, sued KBSA, one of the three main sources for Korean programs, for antitrust … Continue reading

Posted in defamation, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, tortious interference | Leave a comment

French court finds that Facebook fan page doesn’t infringe TM

Report here from Inlex IP Expertise:  “The court considered that using the ‘PLUS BELLE LA VIE’ trademark on a public Facebook page dedicated to this French TV series did not constitute an infringement, in that the trademark was not used … Continue reading

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment