Monthly Archives: August 2014

IPSC part 3: judicial panel

Judicial Panel: Chief Judge Diane Wood (7th Circuit) and Chief Judge Alex Kozinski (9th Circuit) Peter Menell: Discussion question: is IP common law? Wood: throughout the federal level, we are not a pure common law system, nor a civil law … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent | Leave a comment

IPSC part 2: trademark theory

1st Breakout Session: Trademark Theory Harms, Benefits, and Justifications in Trademark Law Stacey Dogan © and patent are often considered to be about incentives (getting benefits), but TM law in the general view is about preventing harm/misinformation, at least in … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

IPSC part 1

Opening notes: usual disclaimers apply. Given the size and scope of the conference, I couldn’t attend half of what interested me. (I wish more people would send in their papers so I could read them!)  My notes aren’t guaranteed to … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent | Leave a comment

bait and switch as both false advertising and trademark infringement

ADT LLC v. Vision Security, LLC, 2014 WL 3764152, No. 13–8119 (S.D. Fla. July 30, 2014) ADT competes with Security Networks to sell alarm systems.  Vision Security is an agent of Security Networks; it doesn’t manufacture alarm systems, but instead … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Use of mark on product isn’t "ad" for insurance purposes

Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co. v. Willowood USA, LLC, No. 6:13–cv–01923, 2014 WL 3797673 (D. Or. Aug. 1, 2014) Willowood was sued for trademark infringement and related causes of action by a former licensor, and sought insurance coverage.  The … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, insurance, trademark | Leave a comment

John Oliver on native advertising

John Oliver covers topics relevant to advertising law again in this piece on native advertising and the fact that it only works by tricking people. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in advertising, commercial speech | Leave a comment

Prevailing copyright defendant acts as private AG, deserves fees

Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., No. 14-1128 (7th Cir. Aug. 4, 2014) Judge Posner throws his usual rhetorical bombs around, this time to the delight of copyright restrictionists.  In Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., 2014 WL 2726187 (7th … Continue reading

Posted in fees, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment