Monthly Archives: December 2014

B&N almost entirely off the hook for copying backpack design

Rubio v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 2014 WL 6769150, No. 14–CV–6561 (S.D.N.Y Nov. 11, 2014) Rubio sued her alma mater, the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) and Barnes & Noble, Inc. for copying her original drawing of a backpack, producing … Continue reading

Posted in copyright, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, right of publicity, standing, trademark, unfairness | Leave a comment

No free lift: ad-as-contract claim survives

Kearney v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, No. 3:14–cv–00254, 2014 WL 6769697 (D. Or. Dec. 1, 2014) Plaintiffs sued on behalf of a proposed nationwide class for breach of contract and violations of various state consumer protection statutes.  The court denied the … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, contracts, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

How do you keep them in the library after they’ve seen Google?

Oral argument in the latest and possibly last round of the longstanding Authors Guild v. Google case apparently went reasonably well for Google.  I was struck by Judge Chin’s statement that his clerks use Google Books to do cite checks.  … Continue reading

Posted in google, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

ABA Blawg 100: submitted for your consideration

I’ve already mentioned my pleasure to be on the nominated list along with my coauthor Eric Goldman’s blog (under Tech for some reason).  Others well worth checking out in/around the advertising field include All About Advertising Law (Venable) and the … Continue reading

Posted in blogging | Leave a comment

Falsity of political ad irrelevant to constitutionality of public entity’s rejection

American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Southeastern Pennysylvania Transportation Authority, No. 2:14-5335 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2014) Plaintiffs sued SEPTA, arguing that it violated their First Amendment rights by refusing to post an ad on buses on the grounds that the … Continue reading

Posted in first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

B&B v. Hargis: just one reaction

When I read the SG’s brief advocating for preclusion as an ordinary result, I was concerned that there was limited understanding of what a registration/opposition proceeding actually is compared to an infringement case.  For example, the SG assumed that in … Continue reading

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

Lack of affirmative statement dooms Lanham Act claim

FMC Corp. v. Summit Agro USA, LLC, 2014 WL 6627727,  No. 14–51 (D. Del. Nov. 14, 2014) (magistrate judge) FMC and Summit Argo compete in the herbicide market.  Herbicides are sold by manufacturers to distributors, thence to retailers, thence to … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Disparagement to suppliers doesn’t trigger Lanham Act

Neonatal Product Group, Inc. v. Shields, No. 13–CV–2601, 2014 WL 6685477 (D. Kan. Nov. 26, 2014) This is largely a patent case, in which defendants threatened Neonatal (dba Creche) with a lawsuit for patent infringement.  Creche sought a declaratory judgment … Continue reading

Posted in commercial speech, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, procedure | Leave a comment