-
Recent Posts
- surveys/expert evidence of deception still not required in consumer protection claims
- when is a publisher sufficiently beholden to a manufacturer to engage in commercial speech?
- Happy inauguration day to Redbubble in particular: 9th Cir. affirms functionality in Lettuce Turnip the Beet
- Dastardly DoorDash fails to get restaurant complaint dismissed, including under UCL/FAL
- WVa SCt immunizes religious schools and camps for false advertising about services
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: January 2015
Q of the day: is this enough disclosure?
Steve Clowney argues that Prawsfblawg’s disclosures of West-sponsored content aren’t enough, given how much a sponsored post looks like a regular post. How would you advise a client to comply with the FTC’s guidance here? Would the purported sophistication of … Continue reading
Posted in disclosures, ftc
Leave a comment
Dial U for unfair competition?
Liveperson, Inc. v. 24/7 Customer, Inc., 2015 WL 170348, No. 14 Civ. 1559 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2015) LivePerson “provides customers with live-interaction and customer engagement technology for e-commerce websites, enabling businesses to interact in real-time with their website customers.” … Continue reading
Pinterest, sponsorship, and copyright
Fascinating story on top pinners on Pinterest, which suggests that Pinterest’s policies deter people from disclosing sponsorships (which the FTC wants them to do; could it go after Pinterest for deterring users’ compliance?), and also contains the interesting note that … Continue reading
Lexmark applies to false association, not just false advertising
International Foundation of Employee Ben. Plans, Inc. v. Cottrell, No. WDQ–14–1269, 2015 WL 127839 (D. Md. Jan. 7, 2015) IFEBP sued Cottrel, d/b/a HR Vantage, for false advertising, trademark infringement, and related claims. IFEBP is a nonprofit that trains … Continue reading
Interpretation of alleged relabeling agreement is for jury
Ecore International, Inc., v. Downey, No. 12–2729, 2015 WL 127316 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 7, 2015) Ecore makes recycled rubber flooring; defendants allegedly relabeled and resold Ecore’s goods as its own. Downey owns an engineering consulting company that provided consulting … Continue reading
Passing off claim is subject to Rule 9(b) but passes
Medscript Pharmacy, LLC v.My Script, LLC, LLC, No. 14 C 0469, 2015 WL 149062 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 12, 2015) The complaint alleged that Medscript was a Professional Compounding Centers of America (PCCA) certified compounding pharmacy, while defendants are compounding … Continue reading
Pop quiz, hotshot
Who authorized the following promo? “Winter is Coming” NHL/Reebok promo, seen on subway Alternatively: the NHL and Reebok can take it, but they don’t want to dish it out: NHL/Reebok trademark statements on ad http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment
Art objects and trademark infringement
Anthony Antonellis creates art objects/sculptures with bottles of Poland Spring water and knockoff wristbands. Nestle objects, claiming likely confusion. What is the appropriate test? Rogers or something else? Antonellis is looking for a pro bono lawyer. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Posted in trademark
Leave a comment