Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. Kwik Lok Corp., No. 16-2767 (2d
Cir. Nov. 2, 2017): In a summary opinion, the Second Circuit affirmed a district
court finding that the design of Kwik Lok’s bag closures, albeit registered
as a mark by the PTO, was functional and thus unprotectable by trademark law,
as well as the belt-and-suspenders finding that no confusion was likely. Thanks to an eagle-eyed correspondent who
should probably buy this
vase as a reward for learning so much about bag closures.
Cir. Nov. 2, 2017): In a summary opinion, the Second Circuit affirmed a district
court finding that the design of Kwik Lok’s bag closures, albeit registered
as a mark by the PTO, was functional and thus unprotectable by trademark law,
as well as the belt-and-suspenders finding that no confusion was likely. Thanks to an eagle-eyed correspondent who
should probably buy this
vase as a reward for learning so much about bag closures.
from Blogger http://ift.tt/2BhxqkC
Rebecca Tushnet 