Author Archives: rtushnet

Focus, Grasshopper: infringement isn’t false advertising

Grasshopper Motorcycles, Ltd. v. Rivera, No. 14–cv–320, 2015 WL 853564 (W.D. Wis. Feb. 26, 2015) (magistrate judge)   Grasshopper sells a moon-shaped backrest designed to be attached behind the driver’s seat of a motorcycle. “Its 2013 sales were approximately $333,000, … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

PTO descriptiveness finding inadmissible where court ruled mark suggestive

Innovation Ventures, LLC v. NVE, Inc., 2015 WL 871137, No. 08–11867 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 27, 2015)   Various evidentiary rulings in the latest round of this trademark/false advertising case over energy shots, the first of which presages what I expect … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, surveys, trademark | Leave a comment

Irreparable harm webinar tomorrow

Please click on the link below to register for a timely lunchtime teleseminar where our panel of experts will address the status of “irreparable harm” in Lanham Act false advertising cases.   Recent cases have suggested that courts no longer … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies | Leave a comment

UK ad regulator finds Israel falsely advertised

By implying that the Old City of Jerusalem was recognized as being in Israel, rather than in occupied Palestinian territories.  File under: having the First Amendment makes the US very different. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in advertising, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Pregnancy clinic ads are commercial speech

First Resort, Inc. v. Herrera, No. C 11-5534 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2015)      The court rejected a facial challenge to San Francisco’s Pregnancy Information Disclosure and Protection Ordinance, “aimed at ensuring that indigent women facing unexpected pregnancies are not … Continue reading →

Posted in commercial speech, first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Copying graffiti could infringe copyright and trademark

Williams v. Roberto Cavalli S.p.A., No. 14-cv-06659 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2015)   Plaintiffs Jason Williams, Victor Chapa, and Jeffrey Rubin sued the producers and distributors of Just Cavalli clothing, alleging copyright infringement, removal and alteration of copyright information (CMI) … Continue reading →

Posted in cmi, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Court misapplies FTDA, not TDRA, to political speech

Hershey Co. v. Friends of Steve Hershey, 2015 WL 795841, No. WDQ–14–1825. (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2015)   Disappointing ruling on political speech and infringement now supplemented by flat-out wrong ruling on dilution.  Hershey sued the Friends of Steve Hershey … Continue reading →

Posted in commercial speech, dilution, first amendment, trademark | Leave a comment

When is a house an advertisement?

Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Kipp Flores Architects, L.L.C., No. 14-50649 (5th Cir. Feb. 26, 2015)   KFA, an architecture firm, got a judgment in a jury trial against a builder, Hallmark Design Homes, for copyright infringement for building hundreds of … Continue reading →

Posted in advertising, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, insurance | Leave a comment

AU IP/Gender: Panel IV: Gendered Understandings of the Role and Scope of IP

Moderator – Irene Calboli, Marquette Law School and National University of Singapore   Carys Craig, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University – Deconstructing Copyright’s Choreographer: the Power of Performance (and the Performance of Power)   Feminist approach to conceptualizing artistic … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, design patent, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

AU IP/Gender Panel III: US Federal Courts

Panel III: Gender and Intellectual Property in the U.S. Federal Courts Moderator – Christine Farley, American University Washington College of Law   Jessica Silbey, Suffolk University Law School – Intellectual Property Reform Through the Lens of Constitutional Equality   Qualitative … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent | Leave a comment