Author Archives: rtushnet

ABA Blawg 100: submitted for your consideration

I’ve already mentioned my pleasure to be on the nominated list along with my coauthor Eric Goldman’s blog (under Tech for some reason).  Others well worth checking out in/around the advertising field include All About Advertising Law (Venable) and the … Continue reading →

Posted in blogging | Leave a comment

Falsity of political ad irrelevant to constitutionality of public entity’s rejection

American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Southeastern Pennysylvania Transportation Authority, No. 2:14-5335 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2014) Plaintiffs sued SEPTA, arguing that it violated their First Amendment rights by refusing to post an ad on buses on the grounds that the … Continue reading →

Posted in first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

B&B v. Hargis: just one reaction

When I read the SG’s brief advocating for preclusion as an ordinary result, I was concerned that there was limited understanding of what a registration/opposition proceeding actually is compared to an infringement case.  For example, the SG assumed that in … Continue reading →

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

Lack of affirmative statement dooms Lanham Act claim

FMC Corp. v. Summit Agro USA, LLC, 2014 WL 6627727,  No. 14–51 (D. Del. Nov. 14, 2014) (magistrate judge) FMC and Summit Argo compete in the herbicide market.  Herbicides are sold by manufacturers to distributors, thence to retailers, thence to … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Disparagement to suppliers doesn’t trigger Lanham Act

Neonatal Product Group, Inc. v. Shields, No. 13–CV–2601, 2014 WL 6685477 (D. Kan. Nov. 26, 2014) This is largely a patent case, in which defendants threatened Neonatal (dba Creche) with a lawsuit for patent infringement.  Creche sought a declaratory judgment … Continue reading →

Posted in commercial speech, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, procedure | Leave a comment

Garcia v. Google briefs

Going up at the Ninth Circuit’s site.  The Organization for Transformative Works filed a brief arguing that the injunction wrongly circumvented the protections of CDA 230 and the DMCA, available here. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in 230, dmca, google, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

ABA Blawg 100

Once again, I’m delighted to have been nominated, and I’d appreciate your vote, though there are many great contenders, including my co-author Eric Goldman (under Tech for some reason). http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Transformative work of the day: Barbie the Computer Engineer

Organization for Transformative Works volunteer Casey Fiesler explains in Slate. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in fanworks, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Reading list: Orly Lobel on employment law as IP law

Orly Lobel, The New Cognitive Property: Human Capital Law and the Reach of Intellectual Property.  Abstract: Contemporary law has become grounded in the conviction that not only the outputs of innovation – artistic expressions, scientific methods, and technological advances – … Continue reading →

Posted in antitrust, contracts, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, reading list | Leave a comment

Lamborghini going to pot?

If “anything can signify anything,” is this equation of a pot with a Lamborghini nominative fair use?  (It’s just an object. It doesn’t mean what you think.) Anything can signify anything billboard, Washington DC Photo by Zach Schrag. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment