Author Archives: rtushnet

IPSC part 10: hodgepodge

Sixth Breakout Session The Patented Design Sarah Burstein What should the patented design cover?  Require the design to be applied to a particular product, and signal that in the name/title.  That better respects First Amendment concerns, notice function of patents, … Continue reading →

Posted in antitrust, design patent, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent, trademark | Leave a comment

IPSC part 9: copyright plenary session

Plenary Session Making Copyright Work for Creative Upstarts Sean Pager Imagine you’re a singer in a rock band, and hear your song used unauthorized for a car commercial. You call and they brush you off.  You can’t afford a lawyer, … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, secondary liability | Leave a comment

IPSC part 8: second plenary: copyright reform/innovation policy

Copyright Reform and the Academy Shira Perlmutter Chief Policy Officer & Director for International Affairs US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) We seem to be poised at the brink of very significant change.  Matching tech change, but policy evolution has … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

IPSC part 7: copyright limitations

Fifth Breakout Session Copyright Limitations Inventing Around Copyright Dan Burk Recurring pattern in ©: Napster/Grokster, where Napster was held liable for having centralized architecture/ability to know what’s on the system and thus being contributorily/vicariously liable. Not surprisingly, next generation P2P … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, secondary liability | Leave a comment

IPSC part 6: copyright/TM enforcement

Fourth Breakout Session Copyright and Trademark Enforcement Do ‘Groundless Threats’ Statutes Curtail IP Over-Enforcement? William Gallagher Research interest: how disputes are negotiated and resolved outside of court, as most legal disputes are.  Studying it qualitatively, based on interviews w/lawyers and … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, secondary liability, trademark | Leave a comment

IPSC part 5: more copyright

Third Breakout Session Copyright and Competition Copyright’s Technological Interdependencies Clark Asay Technological patrons depend on copyright for their motivations.  Copyright is an interdependent part of broader creative systems. Dichotomy between patronage and copyright as alternative systems is wrong.  They work … Continue reading →

Posted in antitrust, copyright, google, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, music | Leave a comment

IPSC part 4: copyright (and a bit on the right of publicity)

Second Breakout Session Copyright Fair Use Raw Materials and Creative Works Andrew Gilden Raw materials concept is part of transformativeness in copyright and right of publicity cases.  Project: Examining the application and meaning of this concept.  Noticeable differences—cases seem to … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, fan fiction, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, presentations, right of publicity | Leave a comment

IPSC part 3: judicial panel

Judicial Panel: Chief Judge Diane Wood (7th Circuit) and Chief Judge Alex Kozinski (9th Circuit) Peter Menell: Discussion question: is IP common law? Wood: throughout the federal level, we are not a pure common law system, nor a civil law … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, dmca, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent | Leave a comment

IPSC part 2: trademark theory

1st Breakout Session: Trademark Theory Harms, Benefits, and Justifications in Trademark Law Stacey Dogan © and patent are often considered to be about incentives (getting benefits), but TM law in the general view is about preventing harm/misinformation, at least in … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

IPSC part 1

Opening notes: usual disclaimers apply. Given the size and scope of the conference, I couldn’t attend half of what interested me. (I wish more people would send in their papers so I could read them!)  My notes aren’t guaranteed to … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent | Leave a comment