Author Archives: rtushnet

Genderswapping Bilbo Baggins

Slate carries an article on reading the Hobbit with Bilbo as a female character.  Derivative work?  (Of course, fandom’s been doing this for a long time.  See Genderswap.) http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in fanworks, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

fleeting uses in documentaries are fair, 4th Circuit says

Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Limited Partnership, No. 12-2543 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2013) Bouchat has been litigating against the Ravens and others for a long time based on the Ravens’ infringement (established after a jury trial) of his design for … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Domain names in the news: political scandal edition

Christie Official At Center Of Probe Bought Domain Names Of Governor’s Political Opponents, via Firedoglake.  ACPA problem? http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

The ASA and ads for offensive products

The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority would seem to have a particular remit: advertising.  A recent adjudication, however, suggests that the ASA will go beyond that, at least online.  Zazzle Inc, No. A13-247896, involved a complaint that Zazzle’s offering of a … Continue reading →

Posted in advertising | Leave a comment

"Natural" plus green imagery not puffery for diapers and wipes

Jou v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., No. C-13-03075, 2013 WL 6491158 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013) (magistrate judge) Plaintiffs brought the usual California claims and claims under Wisconsin law based on the “green” marketing of Huggies “pure & natural” diapers and “Natural … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

FCC regulation doesn’t preempt action against wireless router ads

Netgear, Inc. v. ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., No. C 13-3405, 2013 WL 6512700 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013) Netgear sued defendants, whom I’m going to call ASUS, alleging claims for false advertising/unfair competition, tortious interference, and violations of the Sherman Act.  … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

The TPP and termination rights

The TPP’s Attack on Termination Rights?  Provocative post on EFF’s blog.  Of course we will be told that the TPP doesn’t require changes in domestic law (it just bars many improvements, something that ought to be notable given that Washington … Continue reading →

Posted in contracts, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Descriptive or nominative?

I like clever ads that play both on trademark and non-trademark meaning, but I always wonder if our defenses are sufficient to accommodate them: I saw no indication on the ad that Walmart sought permission for this use of “Apples” … Continue reading →

Posted in trademark | Leave a comment

plaintiff not enough of a competitor to win false marking claim

Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc., No. 7:11–cv–00218, 2013 WL 6408351 (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2013) Previousdiscussion.  The court goes through a lot of facts and effort here to confirm that the AIA made false marking claims essentially impossible to win, and … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, patent | Leave a comment

soy and almond milk couldn’t deceive reasonable consumers

Ang v. Whitewave Foods Co., No. 13-cv-1953, 2013 WL 6492353 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2013) Plaintiffs sued over defendants’ Silk and Horizon products. The Silk products are plant-based beverages, including Silk Vanilla Soymilk, Silk Almond Milk, and Silk Coconut Milk.  … Continue reading →

Posted in california, fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment