Category Archives: california

Apple loses 230 defense to app privacy claims but still wins dismissal

Posted on May 27, 2014 by rtushnet

Opperman v. Path, Inc., 2014 WL 1973378,  No. 13-cv-00453 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2014) This big class action against Apple and fourteen app developers has a lot of issues; I’ll try to focus on the consumer protection parts.  Plaintiffs alleged … Continue reading →

Posted in 230, california, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, privacy, standing | Leave a comment

With a face like that: Maybelline defeats class certification

Posted on May 15, 2014 by rtushnet

Algarin v. Maybelline, LLC, 2014 WL 1883772, No. 12cv3000 (S.D. Cal. May 12, 2014) This case shows the many hurdles now present for consumer class actions.  Once again, perhaps ironically, consumers have no remedy when the harm is probabalistic; only … Continue reading →

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

record-free consumer class action certified as ascertainable

Posted on May 8, 2014 by rtushnet

McCrary v. Elations Co., LLC, 2014 WL 1779243, No. EDCV 13–00242 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2014) The court certified a class alleging the usual California statutory claims against a supplement called Elations, whose label claimed a “clinically-proven combination” and/or “clinically-proven … Continue reading →

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

7-year ad campaign triggers Tobacco II’s reliance rules

Posted on May 1, 2014 by rtushnet

Dodson v. Tempur–Sealy International, Inc., No. 13–cv–04984, 2014 WL 1493676 (N.D. Apr. 16, 2014) Plaintiffs brought twenty-four claims under the laws of eleven states.  The alleged misrepresentations were that Tempur products are “formaldehyde free;” are “free of harmful VOCs [volatile … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

court certifies nationwide damages class for homeopathic products

Posted on May 1, 2014 by rtushnet

Forcellati v. Hyland’s, Inc., No. CV 12–1983, 2014 WL 1410264 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2014) Plaintiff sued for violation of New Jersey, California, and Missouri consumer protection laws (and breach of warranty), alleging that defendants misrepresented that their homeopathic products … Continue reading →

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

claim proceeds against allegedly scammy publishing company now owned by Penguin

Posted on April 30, 2014 by rtushnet

James v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 2014 WL 1407697, No. 13 Civ. 2801 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 11, 2014) Plaintiffs sued Penguin and Author Solutions, a Penguin company, for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violation of California, NY, and Colorado consumer … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, procedure | Leave a comment

It’s an ex-competitor: plaintiff whose service shuffled off this mortal coil lacks standing

Posted on April 1, 2014 by rtushnet

Think Computer Corp. v. Dwolla, Inc., No. 13–CV–02054, 2014 WL 1266213 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2014) Think is a money service business (MSB) and developer of a mobile payment system platform called FaceCash, launched in April 2010.  Defendants were money … Continue reading →

Posted in california, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

Knockout (fruit) punch: Pom class decertified

Posted on April 1, 2014 by rtushnet

In re Pom Wonderful LLC Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, No. ML 10–02199, 2014 WL 1225184 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2014) In what defendants doubtless hope is a winning trend, the court decertified a class on the ground that it’s … Continue reading →

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

tuna surprise: undisclosed slack fill was plausibly misleading

Posted on March 31, 2014 by rtushnet

Hendricks v. StarKist Co., No. 13–cv–729, 2014 WL 1244770 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2014) Hendricks brought the usual California claims against Starkist alleging that its canned tuna products were underfilled (anywhere from 1.1% to 17.3% less tuna than there was … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption, standing | Leave a comment

"I wouldn’t have bought it if I’d known" is enough for standing, 9th Circuit says again

Posted on March 31, 2014 by rtushnet

Galope v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 12–56892, 2014 WL 1244279 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2014) The court of appeals reversed a grant of summary judgment in favor of Deutsche Bank and other defendants.  Galope adequately alleged that she … Continue reading →

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment