Category Archives: consumer protection

A consumer protection case for Fox Mulder?

Hey, I get to make an X-Files reference! Lilly v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 644706 (9th Cir. Feb. 20, 2014) Lilly alleged that the tasty coating on sunflower seed shells is designed to be eaten, and … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

FTC wins big in case against light bulb sellers

The FTC’s Business Center Blog has the details, which include a $21 million refund order representing the gross revenues from the advertised products, with no offsets for the benefit consumers actually received.  A very strong opinion for the FTC, requiring … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, ftc, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

retail purchases mean class isn’t ascertainable

Sethavanish v. ZonePerfect Nutrition Co., 2014 WL 580696, No. 12-2907 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2014) Another case finding that, because the product is cheap and people don’t keep purchase records, and because somebody might lie to get a piece of … Continue reading

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

Connecticut lawyer can’t bring unfair competition claim against California lawyer

Shehu, LLC v. Adams, 2014 WL 567832, CV136017710S (Conn. Super. Ct. Jan. 17, 2014) Plaintiffs (a Connecticut lawyer and his firm) sued Adams and his firm, both located in California.  In 2012, Adams emailed Shehu, LLC and two employees of … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, standing, unfairness | Leave a comment

Neither EPA nor FTC preempt fuel economy consumer protection claim

Gilles v. Ford Motor Co. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2014 WL 544990 (D.Colo. Feb. 12, 2014) Gilles sued Ford for falsely advertising the gas mileage of his 2013 Ford Escape SE. The court denied a motion to dismiss on preemption grounds. … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

gay conversion therapy as false advertising

Story via Salon.  As repugnant as I find these outfits, this might be a new frontier in identifying false/falsifiable claims. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

lawsuit against "humane environment" claims for chicken

Suit accuses Kroger of deception in how chicken were raised. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Grand Theft Auto online delay not actionable

McMahon v. Take–Two Interactive Software, Inc., No. EDCV 13–02032, 2014 WL 324008 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2014) Plaintiffs brought the usual California claims based on plaintiff’s advertisements for Grand Theft Auto Vvideogame as including an online multiplayer component, even though … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

Sony data breach case stripped down but not gone

In re Sony Gaming Networks And Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, No. 11md2258, 2014 WL 223677 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2014) Venkat Balasubramani’s take.  These consolidated cases arose from a criminal intrusion into Sony’s online gaming system. Plaintiffs alleged that … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, contracts, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment

false omission claim fails for insufficiently alleged facts about crib bumper risks

Corral v. Carter’s Inc., 2014 WL 197782, No. 1:13–cv–0262 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2014) Plaintiff sued Carter’s for basically the usual California claims in connection with Carter’s crib bumpers—“a strip of thin padding that is intended to affix to the … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection | Leave a comment