Category Archives: consumer protection

"Handmade" is too vague to be actionable for bourbon

Salters v. Beam Suntory, Inc., 2015 WL 2124939, No. 14cv659 (N.D. Fla. May 1, 2015)   Plaintiffs alleged that Maker’s Mark bourbon was falsely advertised as “handmade.” In a pithy opinion, the court found that they couldn’t state a claim … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Needless markup: outlet stores’ pricing not deceptive

Rubenstein v. Neiman Marcus Group LLC, 2015 WL 1841254, No. CV 14–07155 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2015)   Rubenstein bought two items of clothing from the Neiman Marcus Last Call Store (a discount store, as opposed to the usual upscale … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Third Circuit clarifies its ascertainability rule but doesn’t remove it

Byrd v. Aaron’s Inc., 2015 WL 1727613, No. 14–3050 (3d Cir. Apr. 16, 2015)   The Byrds filed a putative class action against Aaron’s for violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. The court of appeals reversed the district … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Preemption and dormant commerce clause challenges to Cal. Made in US law fail

Clark v. Citizens of Humanity, LLC, No. 14–CV–1404, 2015 WL 1600679 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)   Plaintiffs bought Citizens of Humanity jeans marked with “Made in the USA,” but alleged that the products contained component parts made outside the … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, ftc, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

Primary jurisdiction didn’t warrant dismissal of "natural" claims, 9th Cir. says

Astiana v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. 12-17596 (9th Cir. Apr. 10, 2015)   As the court of appeals introduced the case:   A product labeled “all natural” or “pure natural” likely evokes images of ground herbs and earth extracts … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, fda, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

Restitution available for false discounts even if goods were ok

Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp., 2015 WL 1526559, No. SA CV 12–0215 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)   Spann brought the usual claims against JCP based on purchases she made shopping the sale racks. She believed that she was getting … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies, standing | Leave a comment

using a UDRP statute against foreclosure follies

PLS Investments, LLC v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 2015 WL 1505663, No. 5:14CV139 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 2015)   PLS alleged that Ocwen and the other defendants erroneously and falsely listed its property as a foreclosure property twice—the second time after … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection | Leave a comment

terminated franchisee can sue UPS for false advertising by other franchisees

UPS Store, Inc. v. Hagan, No. 14cv1210, 2015 WL 1456654 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2015)   I’m eliminating large chunks of this dispute involving a terminated UPS franchisee sued for trademark infringement and breach of contract.  The Hagans operated UPS franchise … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

The market for lemon smoothies: injunctive class settlement certified

Lilly v. Jamba Juice Co., 2015 WL 1248027, No. 13-cv-02998 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2015)   This preliminary approval for a settlement contains the most extensive analysis I’ve seen of the “deceived consumers do have standing for injunctive relief in … Continue reading

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies | Leave a comment

court refuses to enjoin consumer protection law on First Amendment grounds

Loan Payment Administration LLC v. Hubanks, 2015 WL 1245895, No. 14-CV-04420 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)   A misinterpretation of nominative fair use mars this otherwise quite sensible rejection of a First Amendment challenge to a consumer protection law.   … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, disclosures, first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment