Category Archives: consumer protection

organic cosmetics class certified

Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. C 11-03082, 2014 WL 6306581 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2014) Hain has staved off class actions several times, but not here: the court certified a class of purchasers of Avalon Organics and Jason … Continue reading

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Koch and wine: punitive damages for wine fraud reduced but allowed

Koch v. Greenberg, 14 F. Supp. 3d 247 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) There’s probably a good magazine article or two in this story.  William Koch, the “litigious younger brother” of Charles and David, bought over 2600 bottles of rare French wine consigned … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, damages, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Prior class settlement precludes state from seeking restitution for false advertising

California v. IntelliGender, LLC, — F.3d —, No. 13–56806, 2014 WL 5786718 (9th Cir. Nov. 7, 2014) The 9th Circuit held that a CAFA-compliant settlement precluded the People of the State of California, acting through their representatives (here San Diego’s … Continue reading

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies | Leave a comment

lack of substantiation versus falsity

In re Bayer Phillips Colon Health Probiotic Sales Practices Litig., No. 11–3017, 2014 WL 5776153 (D.N.J. Nov. 6, 2014) This is another case where Bayer argued that the plaintiff’s claims were merely based on “lack of substantiation” for Bayer’s scientific … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

stricter California rule on Made in USA claims not preempted

Paz v. AG Adriano Goldschmeid, Inc., No. 14cv1372, 2014 WL 5561024 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2014) Paz sued AG, alleging that its “The Protégé” brand jeans were misleadingly marked with a “Made in the U.S.A.” label; he allegedly relied on … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, ftc, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment

Reading list: irrationally sticky defaults

Robert Letzler, Ryan Sandler, Ania Jaroszewicz, Isaac Knowles, and Luke M. Olson, Knowing When to Quit: Default Choices, Demographics and Fraud, Oct. 8, 2014 Abstract: A long literature in psychology and economics has shown that default options influence consumer choices, … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, disclosures, ftc, reading list | Leave a comment

Why do competitors get to challenge claims that consumers don’t?

I have a political economy explanation for this, but I don’t think that’s good enough.  Challenging a “tests prove” claim—explicit or implicit—in Lanham Act cases means showing that the tests don’t prove the proposition for which they are cited.  This … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

"we can do anything" ToS might be unconscionable, providing remedy for loss of music

MacKinnon v. IMVU, Inc., No. H039236  (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2014) MacKinnon sued IMVU, which runs an entertainment service, the “instant messaging virtual universe,” alleging that IMVU deceived users about music purchases and wrongfully restricted users’ ability to play … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, contracts, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Case against allegedly contaminated jerky treats proceeds

In re Milo’s Dog Treats Consolidated Cases, 9 F.Supp.3d 523 (W.D. Pa. 2014) The court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant defendants’ motion to dismiss unjust enrichment claims, but to deny the motion as to the consumer protection and … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Whole Foods’ not wholly natural foods are ok

Gedalia v. Whole Foods Market Services, Inc., 2014 WL 5315030,  No. 4:13–CV–3517 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2014) Gedalia sued on behalf of a putative class of people who bought Whole Foods’s private-label 365 Organic and 365 Everyday Value products allegedly … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption | Leave a comment