Category Archives: consumer protection

The highs are too high: overdraft claims against HSBC continue in part

In re HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., Debit Card Overdraft Fee Litig., 1 F.Supp.3d 34 (E.D.N.Y. 2014) This case involves more of the charming practice of low-to-high charge posting, causing consumers to rack up numerous $35 overdraft charges in a single … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, preemption, unfairness | Leave a comment

Advertising dysfunction: claim against male sexual enhancement pill proceeds

Dorsey v. Rockhard Laboratories, LLC, 2014 WL 4678969, No. CV 13–07557 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2014)   Dorsey sued over Rockhard Weekend (RHW), “a male sexual enhancement product,” primarily promoted by labeling on the packaging. The chemical formulation and packaging … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Ascertain this: All Natural liability class certified

Lilly v. Jamba Juice Company, No. 13-cv-02998, 2014 WL 4652283 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 18, 2014) Earlier Jamba Juice proceeding.  Plaintiffs moved to certify a California class of purchasers of certain frozen Jamba Juice Smoothie Kit products using “All Natural” prominently … Continue reading

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Gratuitous promises: Uber class action continues

Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. C-14-0113 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2014)  Ehret’s putative nationwide class action alleged that Uber customers had been charged a 20% fee above the metered fare for each ride, misrepresented as a “gratuity” automatically added … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

"German Quality" could mislead as to German origin

Marty v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC, — F. Supp. 2d —-, 2014 WL 4388415, No. 13–23656 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2014) (magistrate judge) AB brews Beck’s Beer, which originated from and was brewed in Germany from 1873 until 2012 when AB … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies, standing | Leave a comment

Reasonable psychologist would treat "must pay" dues as mandatory

In re APA Assessment Fee Litigation, — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 4377770, No. 13–7032 (Sept. 5, 2014) The American Psychological Association (APA) is a national nonprofit organization representing clinical, research, and academic psychologists.  Members pay annual fees billed on a … Continue reading

Posted in california, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, unfairness | Leave a comment

Avis tries harder–to obscure extra fees

Schwartz v. Avis Rent A Car System, LLC, 2014 WL 4272018, No. 11–4052 (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2014) I’m blogging this case because of its discussion of the use of consumer perception experts in class actions, which seems to be on … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, disclosures, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Breaking (season) bad: Apple’s season pass promise could violate UCL

Lazebnik v. Apple, Inc., 2014 WL 4275008, No. 5:13–CV–04145 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014) The plaintiff sued Apple for misrepresenting its Breaking Bad “season pass.”  As the court explained, “[f]rom the time Season 5 of Breaking Bad was first announced, … Continue reading

Posted in california, class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Consumers can’t be forced to use nonexistent arbitration proceeding

Jackson v. Payday Financial, LLC, No. 12-2617 (7th Cir. Aug. 22, 2014) The Seventh Circuit reversed the district court’s holding that it could not hear consumer claims against payday lenders doing business from a tribal location. Martin Webb was an … Continue reading

Posted in consumer protection, unconscionability | Leave a comment

Coffee’s for classes: 7th Cir. reinstates class action over instant coffee

Suchanek v. Sturm Foods, Inc., No. 13-3843, 2014 WL 4116493 (7th Cir. Aug. 22, 2014) Sturm entered the market for Keurig-compatible individual coffee pods (K-Cups) once patent protection expired, but according to plaintiffs they jumped the gun. The Seventh Circuit … Continue reading

Posted in class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment