-
Recent Posts
- Fairlife brand name plausibly misleading where cows allegedly lived abuse-filled lives of suffering
- disgorgement can’t be a lottery windfall–even when D was engaged in illegal gambling
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: copyright
IP in the UK
Sir Robin Jacob, Daniel Alexander QC, and Matthew Fisher, Guidebook to Intellectual Property (6th ed.): With dry humor, this book surveys British IP law for nonlawyers/business student types. I’m not in a position to comment too much on substance. In … Continue reading
Reading list: Copyright equality
Peter DiCola, Copyright Equality: Free Speech, Efficiency, and Regulatory Parity in Distribution. Abstract: Copyright law treats webcasters like Pandora, on-demand streaming services like Spotify, the satellite radio company Sirius XM, and traditional radio broadcasters like Clear Channel in vastly different … Continue reading
rigorous falsity standard in sophisticated market defeats false advertising claim
Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Foray Technologies, LLC, No. C 12-03762, 2014 WL 572290 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2014) Plaintiff (here VeriPic) and defendant both sell digital asset management software to law enforcement. VeriPic and Foray both sell software that … Continue reading
WIPIP: IP theory
Session 4: IP Theory, Parlor B Annemarie Bridy, Internet Payment Blockades Wikileaks: State Department publicly accused Wikileaks of violating US law; payment systems were suspended—PayPal, Visa, Mastercard. Wikileaks ran through cash reserves in less than a year and suspended publication. … Continue reading
WIPIP: copyright doctrine
Session 3: Copyright Doctrine Patrick Goold , UC Berkeley School of Law (fellow) Is Liability for Copyright Infringement Strict? Strict liability is conduct plus outcome. Fault-based is conduct, outcome, and fault. Fault can be based on the standard of conduct … Continue reading
WIPIP: First Amendment
Session 2: First Amendment T.J. Chiang, George Mason University Patents and the First Amendment Patents on methods of communication: why isn’t this a 1A problem? Similar to ©: can prevent other people from saying what they want to say, how … Continue reading
WIPIP: copyright procedure
Sat. Session 1: Copyright Procedure Julie Cromer Young, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Rethinking Copyright Pleadings Historically low pleading standards changed by Twiqbal. Conclusory allegations can be ignored, then remaining judged for plausibility; court can use common sense to see … Continue reading
WIPIP part 2, TM doctrine (and false advertising)
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of Law Sleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark Convention TTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. Philip Morris—cancelled an incontestable mark on the ground that it violated the Pan-American Convention, which is self-executing. That … Continue reading
Works in Progress in IP, part 1
WIPIP Session 1: Copyright Theory, Parlor C Chris Buccafusco & David Fagundes, The Moral Foundations of Copyright (Fagundes presenting) Copyright is deeply moral; best explained by moral foundations theory; these are descriptive claims. Normative claims: how we talk about copyright/how … Continue reading
Dastar misunderstanding watch
Fergon Architects LLC v. Oakley Home Builders, Inc., 2014 WL 340035, No. 13 C 6019 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2014) (magistrate judge) Fergon sued Oakley for copyright infringement for exceeding its license to use Fergon’s architectural works. The contract allegedly … Continue reading