-
Recent Posts
- erroneously collecting sales tax isn’t an unfair act or practice in trade or commerce
- I can’t believe it’s not butter—because the label said it was all butter
- Another pandemic university fees claim fails
- Dastar bars some claims about “patented” statements but related superiority statements are still at issue
- policy of paying only 85% purchase price for claims under service policy isn’t inherently deceptive/abusive
Recent Comments
Archives
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: disclosures
state can regulate health referral provider’s speech about potential benefits
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. Otto, 2014 WL 904190, No. 13-1167, — F.3d —- (8th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014) My discussion of the opinion below. 411-Pain advertises extensively and connects callers to health care providers or attorneys in their areas. … Continue reading
The dangers of monetizing a Twitter feed
I’ve seen commentary about how this article on the successful monetization of photostream Twitter accounts by a company called Kulfoto ignores that the copyright situation of the photos it shares seems to be … unclear at best However, I was … Continue reading
HLR Free Speech Symposium: Rebecca Tushnet, More than a Feeling: Emotion and the First Amendment
My paper versus the other topics: One of these things is not like the others. Regulation of non-press entities is also an important part of modern speech regulation, and I do think my topic is grounded in Sullivan, although not … Continue reading
Second Circuit allows one mandatory pregnancy center disclosure
Evergreen Ass’n, Inc. v. City of New York, — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 184993 (2d Cir. 2014) The City appealed from a preliminary injunction against Local Law 17, which required pregnancy services centers to make certain disclosures about their services. … Continue reading
Posted in disclosures, first amendment
Leave a comment
Blurred lines, part 3
Panel 3: The Way Forward on Transparency: A discussion of best practices Moderator: Mary K. Engle, Associate Director, Division of Advertising Practices, FTC Examples of native ads: “sponsored” story, labeled as such in gray at the top of the headline, … Continue reading
Posted in advertising, disclosures, ftc
Leave a comment
Blurred lines: really part 2 this time
Sorry for earlier posting difficulties. The Lessons of Nauru Bob Garfield, Co-host of On the Media and MediaPost columnist Nauru: was wealthy; phosphate resource from centuries of built up guano was valuable, but only took 50 years to destroy, and … Continue reading
Posted in advertising, disclosures, ftc
Leave a comment
Name your own price, then pay more: Court upholds Priceline’s model
Freeman v. Priceline.com, Inc., 2013 WL 5946069, B242653 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 7, 2013) The court of appeals upheld a ruling getting Priceline off the hook for promising one price and delivering another, because the terms and conditions said that … Continue reading
Is disclosure of recurring charges enough?
At Slate, a story about Boingo raises questions about what other steps a business ought to take to ensure that consumers make informed decisions to keep accepting recurring charges, when we know that many consumers don’t review their bank/credit card statements … Continue reading
Posted in disclosures, ftc, unfairness
Leave a comment
law barring "surcharge for credit" signs unconstitutional
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 13 Civ. 3775, 2013 WL 5477607 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2013) Under NY GBL § 518, a vendor who wants to impose a surcharge for using a credit card to compensate for the credit card companies’ … Continue reading
"unlimited" service that was actually limited could deceive consumers
Chapman v. Skype Inc., — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, No. B241398, 2013 WL 5502960 (Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2013) Chapman alleged that Skype falsely advertised its voice over IP calling plans as “Unlimited” when they actually limited the number of minutes per … Continue reading