-
Recent Posts
- Deadly automatic litterbox might be falsely advertised as “safe”
- Amicus in support of cert in Lanham Act intent/damages case
- Does “Dead Weeds in 1 Day” mean the entire weed will die, or just the visible part?
- (c) licensor’s claims about competitor’s allegedly worse licenses were opinion, not falsifiable fact
- Fairlife brand name plausibly misleading where cows allegedly lived abuse-filled lives of suffering
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: first amendment
WIPIP: First Amendment
Session 2: First Amendment T.J. Chiang, George Mason University Patents and the First Amendment Patents on methods of communication: why isn’t this a 1A problem? Similar to ©: can prevent other people from saying what they want to say, how … Continue reading
Works in Progress in IP, part 1
WIPIP Session 1: Copyright Theory, Parlor C Chris Buccafusco & David Fagundes, The Moral Foundations of Copyright (Fagundes presenting) Copyright is deeply moral; best explained by moral foundations theory; these are descriptive claims. Normative claims: how we talk about copyright/how … Continue reading
Harvard Law Review Symposium on Freedom of the Press
Copied from Balkinization.Harvard Law Review Symposium 2014: Freedom of the PressA conference in celebration of the 50th anniversary ofNew York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).February 15, 2014Harvard Law SchoolAustin North8:45 Breakfast9:20 Introduction:Mark TushnetHarvard Law School“Reflections on the … Continue reading
Second Circuit allows one mandatory pregnancy center disclosure
Evergreen Ass’n, Inc. v. City of New York, — F.3d —-, 2014 WL 184993 (2d Cir. 2014) The City appealed from a preliminary injunction against Local Law 17, which required pregnancy services centers to make certain disclosures about their services. … Continue reading
Posted in disclosures, first amendment
Leave a comment
Taking on notorious criminal’s persona is protected by First Amendment
Ross v. Roberts, No. B242531, 2013 WL 6780578 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013) Ricky Ross, aka Rick Ross and “Freeway” Ricky Ross, “is a former criminal who achieved some sort of celebrity status due, in part, to the enormous … Continue reading
Posted in first amendment, right of publicity
Leave a comment
Publisher can’t maintain Lanham Act claim against satirical blog post
Farah v. Esquire Magazine, No. 12–7055, 2013 WL 6169660, — F.3d – (D.C. Cir. Nov. 26, 2013) Mark Warren wrote a blog post on Esquire Magazine’s Politics Blog. The entry was posted one day after the release of Jerome Corsi’s … Continue reading
Soul man is sad man
Moore v. Weinstein Co., LLC, No.12-5715 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 2013) Sam Moore, half of the music duo Sam & Dave sued a number of defendants related to the 2008 fim Soul Man and its accompanying soundtrack. The court of … Continue reading
Posted in dilution, first amendment, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
Student-athletes’ right of publicity claims can ground antitrust claims
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation, No. C 09-1967 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2013) Plaintiffs, current and former college athletes, sued the NCAA; they also sued Collegiate Licensing Company and Electronic Arts, but settled those claims. This … Continue reading
Posted in antitrust, first amendment, right of publicity
Leave a comment
First Amendment bars Lanham Act claim against university article repository
Pellegrini v. Northeastern University, No. 12–cv–40141, 2013 WL 5607019 (D. Mass. Aug. 23, 2013) (magistrate judge) The magistrate began by characterizing this case as a high-stakes dispute involving “the First Amendment rights of a university and one of its faculty … Continue reading
law barring "surcharge for credit" signs unconstitutional
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 13 Civ. 3775, 2013 WL 5477607 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2013) Under NY GBL § 518, a vendor who wants to impose a surcharge for using a credit card to compensate for the credit card companies’ … Continue reading