Category Archives: http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post

Laches bars Fitbug’s TM claim against Fitbit

Posted on February 2, 2015 by rtushnet

Fitbug Ltd. v. Fitbit, Inc., 2015 WL 350923, No. 13-1418 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)   Fitbit and Fitbug both make wearable electronic fitness tracking devices that connect to the internet and to other devices. They both have federal registrations. … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Dastar doesn’t bar true reverse passing off claim

Posted on February 2, 2015 by rtushnet

Luxul Technology Inc. v. NectarLux, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 352048, No. 14-CV-03656 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)   Luxul makes LED products. Its patented EazyLux LED tube lamps can replace fluorescent tube lamps without rewiring. The parties contracted … Continue reading →

Posted in copyright, dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing, trademark | Leave a comment

failure to conform exclusion precludes insurance coverage of false advertising

Posted on February 2, 2015 by rtushnet

General Star Indem. Co. v. Driven Sports, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 307017, No. 14–CV–3579 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2015)   General Star issued an insurance policy to Driven, which sold a “pre-workout energy supplement” called “Craze.” Driven was sued … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, insurance | Leave a comment

Dastar-barred claim survives both as false advertising and false designation

Posted on January 30, 2015 by rtushnet

Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. Huber, 28 F. Supp. 3d 306 (M.D. Pa. 2014)   AFS sued Huber for violations of the Lanham Act, the CFAA, the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and various common law claims.  AFS designs and … Continue reading →

Posted in dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, tortious interference, trade secrets | Leave a comment

DC rejects POM’s FTC challenge

Posted on January 30, 2015 by rtushnet

Via the Consumer Law & Policy Blog.  I must digest both lunch and this ruling, but I will definitely have more to say soon. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in first amendment, ftc, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

false advertising claim based on "innovative/unique" survives

Posted on January 30, 2015 by rtushnet

Ferris Mfg. Corp. v. Carr, No. 14 C 04663, 2015 WL 279355 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2015)   Ferris sued Roy Carr and Curaline. Ferris makes various wound care products, allegedly award-winning and covered by several patents.  Carr was formerly … Continue reading →

Posted in dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

False PAC advertising?

Posted on January 28, 2015 by rtushnet

This detailed Politico story suggests that there’s a fraudulent misrepresentation problem, but that the FEC can’t do much about it. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Distributor’s TM registration blocks manufacturer’s claim

Posted on January 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Mighty Enterprises, Inc. v. She Hong Indus. Co. Ltd., 2015 WL 276771, No. 2:14–cv–06516 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2015)   Mighty distributes and services heavy machinery. She Hong makes heavy machinery under the name “Hartford.” Mighty sued She Hong for … Continue reading →

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

No standing for injunction-only class

Posted on January 26, 2015 by rtushnet

Graiser v. Visionworks of America, 2015 WL 248003, No. 1:14–CV–01641 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2015)   Graiser sought an injunction on behalf of a putative class based on his false advertising claims, which alleged that Visionworks’s buy one get one … Continue reading →

Posted in class actions, consumer protection, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, remedies, standing | Leave a comment

Transformative use of the day: Washington’s football team edition

Posted on January 23, 2015 by rtushnet

This ad uses footage of Washington’s team to make the point that its racially inflammatory name and mascot are unnecessary.  Consider the TM and copyright implications! http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment