Category Archives: http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post

3rd Annual Trademark Works in Progress event at AU

Charles Colman, Trademark Law and the Prickly Ambivalence of Post-Parodies: The way that people play with trademarks that companies have deliberately infused with atmospherics, per Jessica Litman, and to which people have predictable emotional responses.  TM doesn’t have good ways … Continue reading

Posted in first amendment, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Court declines to apply Lexmark to TM

Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. v. Wall Street Equity Group, Inc., 2014 WL 4843674, No. 8:10–CV–365 (D. Neb. Sept. 29, 2014) This is a default so it’s just what the court decided to examine with respect to the facts; nonetheless there … Continue reading

Posted in damages, dilution, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Future of Music conference announcement w/scholarships

The Future of Music Coalition’s 14th annual Policy Summit ( http://futureofmusic.org/summit ) is October 27-28 in Washington, DC. It is offering scholarships for students and musicians starting at $25 for both days.  From FOMC: Future of Music Coalition ( http://futureofmusic.orgContinue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post | Leave a comment

Phantom trademark of the Opera: Dastar bars Slep-Tone’s claim

(There are a lot of Slep-Tone cases floating out around there. I like this one.) Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Canton Phoenix Inc., 3:14-cv-00764 (D. Or. Sept. 4, 2014) (magistrate judge) Slep-Tone, a maker of karaoke CDs, alleged that defendants (a … Continue reading

Posted in dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

statements to regulators aren’t commercial advertising

Presby Environmental, Inc. v. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc., No. 13–cv–355, 2014 WL 4922986 (D.N.H. Sept. 30, 2014) Presby sued ADS, a competitor in the septic system product market, for allegedly violating a settlement agreement; I’m only going to address the … Continue reading

Posted in commercial speech, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

EFF investigates keylogger software, finds false advertising

From its report on ComputerCOP: In investigating ComputerCOP, we also discovered misleading marketing material, including a letter of endorsement purportedly from the U.S. Department of Treasury, which has now issued a fraud alert over the document. ComputerCOP further claims an … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Stay away from Juliet: keyword infringement and dilution case continues

Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. Assara I, LLC, No. 08-CV-442, 2014 BL 263647 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2014) A keyword case gets past the pleading stage (though the worst part is the dilution ruling).  The parties compete in … Continue reading

Posted in defamation, dilution, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, trademark | Leave a comment

Reading list: is efficiency all there is in copyright?

Oren Bracha and Talha Syed, Beyond Efficiency: Consequence-Sensitive Theories of Copyright, 29 Berkeley Tech. L.J. (2014). The article’s argument is complicated and I would disserve it by trying to summarize, but a core point is that, to the extent that … Continue reading

Posted in http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, reading list | Leave a comment

selling a book without authorization doesn’t violate Lanham Act

Smith v. BarnesandNoble.com, LLC, No. 1:12-cv-04374, 2014 BL 263099 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2014) Smith wrote a book, Hardscrabble. He contracted with Smashwords, an online ebook distributor, to sell his book. Smashwords distributed Smith’s book to its retail partners, including B&N, … Continue reading

Posted in dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, secondary liability, trademark | Leave a comment

Allegedly false inventorship/ownership claim could be false advertising

Parallel Synthesis Technologies, Inc. v. DeRisi, 2014 WL 4748611, No. 5:13-cv-05968 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2014) (magistrate judge) Plaintiff Parallel, allegedly “seduced by the potential for a long-term partnership,” shared its proprietary Parallume assay with DeRisi, a professor of biochemistry … Continue reading

Posted in dastar, http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post, standing | Leave a comment